Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26785684›Full record

ReviewJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society2016

Advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis.

Raymond Behrendt, Peter White, John Offer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 730 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Peptide-Triazole Conjugates: Strategic Synthesis, Antimicrobial Properties, and Molecular Docking Study.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HFGuidedDesign:Chemical science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raymond BehrendtNovabiochem, Merck & Cie, Im Laternenacker 5, 8200, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.
Peter WhiteNovabiochem, Merck Chemicals Ltd, Padge Road, Beeston, NG9 2JR, UK.
John OfferThe Francis Crick Institute, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK.
Merck (United Kingdom) · GBMSD (Switzerland) · CHThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U117592730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, Fmoc SPPS is the method of choice for peptide synthesis. Very-high-quality Fmoc building blocks are available at low cost because of the economies of scale arising from current multiton production of therapeutic peptides by Fmoc SPPS. Many modified derivatives are commercially available as Fmoc building blocks, making synthetic access to a broad range of peptide derivatives straightforward. The number of synthetic peptides entering clinical trials has grown continuously over the last decade, and recent advances in the Fmoc SPPS technology are a response to the growing demand from medicinal chemistry and pharmacology. Improvements are being continually reported for peptide quality, synthesis time and novel synthetic targets. Topical peptide research has contributed to a continuous improvement and expansion of Fmoc SPPS applications.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino AcidsAspartic AcidCell LineEpithelial CellsFluorenesGlycosylationHumansMethylationPeptidesPhosphorylationProtein PrenylationSolid-Phase Synthesis TechniquesAmino AcidsAspartic AcidaspartimideFluorenesPeptidesaspartimideFmoc/tBupeptide thioesterpost-translational modificationprotecting groupracemisationsolid-phase peptide synthesis

Identifiers

PMID26785684
PMCPMC4745034
OpenAlexW2337777524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.