Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26785637›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Process evaluation of TXT2BFiT: a multi-component mHealth randomised controlled trial to prevent weight gain in young adults.

Stephanie R Partridge, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, Kevin McGeechan, Kate Balestracci, Annette T Y Wong, Lana Hebden, Mark F Harris, Adrian Bauman, Philayrath Phongsavan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: a mixed-methods systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephanie R PartridgeSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. stephanie.partridge@sydney.edu.au.
Margaret Allman-FarinelliSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. margaret.allman-farinelli@sydney.edu.au.
Kevin McGeechanSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. kevin.mcgeechan@sydney.edu.au.
Kate BalestracciSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. katebal12@yahoo.com.
Annette T Y WongSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. annette.wong@sydney.edu.au.
Lana HebdenSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. lana.hebden@sydney.edu.au.
Mark F HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. m.f.harris@unsw.edu.au.
Adrian BaumanSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. adrian.bauman@sydney.edu.au.
Philayrath PhongsavanSydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. philayrath.phongsavan@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTXT2BFiT was one of the first few innovative mHealth programs designed for young adults (18-35 years) with demonstrated efficacy in weight management. However, research is lacking to understand intervention effectiveness, especially in complex, multi-component mHealth programs. This paper investigates participant perceptions of and engagement with the mHealth program components in the TXT2BFiT to understand program effects.

methodsProcess evaluation data were collected continuously for the study duration. The TXT2BFiT program was a multi-component lifestyle program delivered intensively for 3-month followed by a 6-month maintenance phase. Program components included personalised coaching calls, text messages, emails, smartphone apps and website access. Process evaluation measures included frequency of use of components and frequency for number of components used (online survey data); dose delivered and engagement with program components (researcher logs and web platform reports); frequency, timing and difficulties experienced with program components (online survey data) and overall perceptions of program components (online survey data and semi-structured telephone interviews). Qualitative data analysis was performed using NVivo10.

resultsOver 80% of participants completed post-intervention (3-months, intervention, n = 110, control n = 104) and follow-up surveys (9-months, intervention, n = 96, control n = 104). Thirty intervention participants completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants reported high use of coaching calls, text messages and emails and no issues in content delivery from these components. These components were described as helping them to achieve their goals. Website and app use and engagement was low for the duration of the program. Participants would prefer incorporation of the self-monitoring apps and website resources into one smartphone application that can be individualised by entry of their personal data.

conclusionsOur process evaluation has allowed a comprehensive understanding of use and preference for different program components. The high value placed on the coaching calls is consistent with a desire for personalisation of the mHealth program and even further tailoring of text messages and emails. The findings of this study will be used to revise TXT2BFiT for future users.

trial registrationThe trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12612000924853 ).

Indexed as

Cell PhoneLife StyleMotivationTelemedicineText MessagingWeight GainAdolescentAdultAustraliaElectronic MailFemaleHumansInternetMaleMobile ApplicationsNew Zealand

Identifiers

PMID26785637
PMCPMC4717560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.