Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26785607›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2016

Compound EGFR mutation is frequently detected with co-mutations of actionable genes and associated with poor clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma.

Eun Young Kim, Eun Na Cho, Heae Surng Park, Ji Young Hong, Seri Lim, Jong Pil Youn, Seung Yong Hwang, Yoon Soo Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in AtypicalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Young Kima Department of Internal Medicine , Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Eun Na Choa Department of Internal Medicine , Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Heae Surng Parkb Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Ji Young Hongc Department of Bio-Nanotechnology , Hanyang University , Sangnok-gu, Ansan , Gyeonggi-do , Republic of Korea.
Seri Lim
Jong Pil Youn
Seung Yong Hwangc Department of Bio-Nanotechnology , Hanyang University , Sangnok-gu, Ansan , Gyeonggi-do , Republic of Korea.
Yoon Soo Changa Department of Internal Medicine , Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRHanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compound EGFR mutations, defined as double or multiple mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, are frequently detected with advances in sequencing technology but its clinical significance is unclear. This study analyzed 61 cases of EGFR mutation positive lung adenocarcinoma using next-generation sequencing (NGS) based repeated deep sequencing panel of 16 genes that contain actionable mutations and investigated clinical implication of compound EGFR mutations. Compound EGFR mutation was detected in 15 (24.6%) of 61 cases of EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma. The majority (12/15) of compound mutations are combination of the atypical mutation and typical mutations such as exon19 deletion, L858R or G719X substitutions, or exon 20 insertion whereas 3 were combinations of rare atypical mutations. The patients with compound mutation showed shorter overall survival than those with simple mutations (83.7 vs. 72.8 mo; P = 0.020, Breslow test). Among the 115 missense mutations discovered in the tested genes, a few number of actionable mutations were detected irrelevant to the subtype of EGFR mutations, including ALK rearrangement, BCL2L11 intron 2 deletion, KRAS c.35G>A, PIK3CA c.1633G>A which are possible target of crizotinib, BH3 mimetics, MEK inhibitors, and PI3K-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. 31 missense mutations were detected in the cases with simple mutations whereas 84 in those with compound mutation, showing that the cases with compound missense mutation have higher burden of missense mutations (P = 0.001, independent sample t-test). Compound EGFR mutations are detected at a high frequency using NGS-based repeated deep sequencing. Because patients with compound EGFR mutations showed poor clinical outcomes, they should be closely monitored during follow-up.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsCompound EGFR mutationco-mutationEGFRlung adenocarcinomaNGSrepeated deep sequencingsimple EGFR mutation

Identifiers

PMID26785607
PMCPMC4848002
OpenAlexW2251851976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.