Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26785491›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2015

Single-base pair differences in a shared motif determine differential Rhodopsin expression.

Jens Rister, Ansa Razzaq, Pamela Boodram, Nisha Desai, Cleopatra Tsanis, Hongtao Chen, David Jukam, Claude Desplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pathogenic variants inGenome research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insect opsins and evo-devo: what have we learned in 25 years?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The power of the (imperfect) palindrome: Sequence-specific roles of palindromic motifs in gene regulation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jens RisterCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Ansa RazzaqCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Pamela BoodramCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Nisha DesaiCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Cleopatra TsanisCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Hongtao ChenCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
David JukamCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA.
Claude DesplanCenter for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA. cd38@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
Stochastic choices in the retina and optic lobesR01EY013010 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DESPLAN, CLAUDE · 1999 to 2025
$9.1M
Deciphering the regulatory logic of rhodopsin expressionK99EY023995 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI RISTER, JENS · 2014 to 2015
$178k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY023995NEI NIH HHS K99EY023995NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013010NEI NIH HHS R01 EY13010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The final identity and functional properties of a neuron are specified by terminal differentiation genes, which are controlled by specific motifs in compact regulatory regions. To determine how these sequences integrate inputs from transcription factors that specify cell types, we compared the regulatory mechanism of Drosophila Rhodopsin genes that are expressed in subsets of photoreceptors to that of phototransduction genes that are expressed broadly, in all photoreceptors. Both sets of genes share an 11-base pair (bp) activator motif. Broadly expressed genes contain a palindromic version that mediates expression in all photoreceptors. In contrast, each Rhodopsin exhibits characteristic single-bp substitutions that break the symmetry of the palindrome and generate activator or repressor motifs critical for restricting expression to photoreceptor subsets. Sensory neuron subtypes can therefore evolve through single-bp changes in short regulatory motifs, allowing the discrimination of a wide spectrum of stimuli.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBase PairingDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMutationPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebratePromoter Regions, GeneticRhodopsinTranscription FactorsVision, OcularDrosophila ProteinsRhodopsinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26785491
PMCPMC4919384
OpenAlexW2307093200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.