Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26785325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Prognostic Significance of Promoter DNA Hypermethylation of cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) Gene in Primary Breast Cancer.

Naoko Minatani, Mina Waraya, Keishi Yamashita, Mariko Kikuchi, Hideki Ushiku, Ken Kojo, Akira Ema, Hiroshi Nishimiya, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Hiroshi Katoh and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role ofBiomedicines · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Screening of key methylation-driven genes CDO1 in breast cancer based on WGCNA.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Biomarkers of Bad Biology: Curse or a Blessing?Annals of surgical oncology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naoko MinataniDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mina WarayaDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keishi YamashitaDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mariko KikuchiDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideki UshikuDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ken KojoDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akira EmaDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi NishimiyaDepartment of Surgery, Yamato Municipal Hospital, Yamato, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshimasa KosakaDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi KatohDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Norihiko SengokuDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hirokazu TaninoDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
David SidranskyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kitasato University · JPJohns Hopkins University · USYamato Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using pharmacological unmasking microarray, we identified promoter DNA methylation of cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) gene in human cancer. In this study, we assessed the clinicopathological significance of CDO1 methylation in primary breast cancer (BC) with no prior chemotherapy. The CDO1 DNA methylation was quantified by TaqMan methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) in 7 BC cell lines and 172 primary BC patients with no prior chemotherapy. Promoter DNA of the CDO1 gene was hypermethylated in 6 BC cell lines except SK-BR3, and CDO1 gene expression was all silenced at mRNA level in the 7 BC cell lines. Quantification of CDO1 methylation was developed using Q-MSP, and assessed in primary BC. Among the clinicopathologic factors, CDO1 methylation level was not statistically significantly associated with any prognostic factors. The log-rank plot analysis elucidated that the higher methylation the tumors harbored, the poorer prognosis the patients exhibited. Using the median value of 58.0 as a cut-off one, disease specific survival in BC patients with CDO1 hypermethylation showed significantly poorer prognosis than those with hypomethylation (p = 0.004). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified that CDO1 hypermethylation was prognostic factor as well as Ki-67 and hormone receptor status. The most intriguingly, CDO1 hypermethylation was of robust prognostic relevance in triple negative BC (p = 0.007). Promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene was robust prognostic indicator in primary BC patients with no prior chemotherapy. Prognostic relevance of the CDO1 promoter DNA methylation is worthy of being paid attention in triple negative BC cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPromoter Regions, GeneticAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCysteine DioxygenaseEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCDO1 protein, humanCysteine Dioxygenase

Identifiers

PMID26785325
PMCPMC4718689
OpenAlexW2397209014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.