Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26784348›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Perfusion-CT--Can We Predict Acute Pancreatitis Outcome within the First 24 Hours from the Onset of Symptoms?

Joanna Pieńkowska, Katarzyna Gwoździewicz, Katarzyna Skrobisz-Balandowska, Iwona Marek, Justyna Kostro, Edyta Szurowska, Michał Studniarek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna PieńkowskaII Department of Radiology-Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Katarzyna GwoździewiczI Department of Radiology-Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Katarzyna Skrobisz-BalandowskaI Department of Radiology-Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Iwona MarekDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Justyna KostroDepartment of General Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Edyta SzurowskaII Department of Radiology-Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Michał StudniarekI Department of Radiology-Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSevere acute pancreatitis (AP) is still a significant clinical problem which is associated with a highly mortality. The aim of this study was the evaluation of prognostic value of CT regional perfusion measurement performed on the first day of onset of symptoms of AP, in assessing the risk of developing severe form of acute pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND

methods79 patients with clinical symptoms and biochemical criteria indicative of acute pancreatitis (acute upper abdominal pain, elevated levels of serum amylase and lipase) underwent perfusion CT within 24 hours after onset of symptoms. The follow-up examinations were performed after 4-6 days to detect progression of the disease. Perfusion parameters were compared in 41 people who developed severe form of AP (pancreatic and/or peripancreatic tissue necrosis) with parameters in 38 consecutive patients in whom course of AP was mild. Blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time and permeability surface area product were calculated in the three anatomic pancreatic subdivisions (head, body and tail). At the same time the patient's clinical status was assessed by APACHE II score and laboratory parameters such as CRP, serum lipase and amylase, AST, ALT, GGT, ALP and bilirubin were compared.

resultsStatistical differences in the perfusion parameters between the group of patients with mild and severe AP were shown. Blood flow, blood volume and mean transit time were significantly lower and permeability surface area product was significantly higher in patients who develop severe acute pancreatitis and presence of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrosis due to pancreatic ischemia. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of evaluated on admission severity of pancreatitis assessed using APACHE II score and laboratory tests.

conclusionsCT perfusion is a very useful indicator for prediction and selection patients in early stages of acute pancreatitis who are at risk of developing pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrosis already on the first day of the onset of symptoms and can be used for treatment planning and monitoring of therapy of acute pancreatitis. Early suspicion of possible pancreatic necrosis both on the basis of scores based on clinical status and laboratory tests have low predictive value.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmylasesDisease ProgressionEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansLipaseMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPerfusion ImagingPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAmylasesLipase

Identifiers

PMID26784348
PMCPMC4718557
OpenAlexW2431590289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.