Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26784196›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation.

Luis F Gonzalez, Glen A Montes, Eduard Puig, Sandra Johnson, Kerrie Mengersen, Kevin J Gaston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Thermal drone surveys to detect arboreal fauna: Improving population estimates and threatened species monitoring.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CECS-CLIP: Fusing Domain Knowledge for Rare Wildlife Detection Model.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Analysis of the Drinking Behavior of Beef Cattle Using Computer Vision.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luis F GonzalezAustralian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation (ARCAA), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. felipe.gonzalez@qut.edu.au.
Glen A MontesAustralian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation (ARCAA), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. glen.montes@mail.escuelaing.edu.co.
Eduard PuigAustralian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation (ARCAA), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. eduard.puiggarcia@qut.edu.au.
Sandra JohnsonARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. sandra.johnson@qut.edu.au.
Kerrie MengersenARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. k.mengersen@qut.edu.au.
Kevin J GastonEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK. k.j.gaston@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveying threatened and invasive species to obtain accurate population estimates is an important but challenging task that requires a considerable investment in time and resources. Estimates using existing ground-based monitoring techniques, such as camera traps and surveys performed on foot, are known to be resource intensive, potentially inaccurate and imprecise, and difficult to validate. Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), artificial intelligence and miniaturized thermal imaging systems represent a new opportunity for wildlife experts to inexpensively survey relatively large areas. The system presented in this paper includes thermal image acquisition as well as a video processing pipeline to perform object detection, classification and tracking of wildlife in forest or open areas. The system is tested on thermal video data from ground based and test flight footage, and is found to be able to detect all the target wildlife located in the surveyed area. The system is flexible in that the user can readily define the types of objects to classify and the object characteristics that should be considered during classification.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAircraftAlgorithmsAnimalsAnimals, WildEndangered SpeciesEnvironmental MonitoringEquipment DesignForestsGeographic Information SystemsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntroduced SpeciesUser-Computer InterfaceVideo Recordingartificial intelligenceautomatic classificationconservationdeerdingokoalaroboticsthermal imagingUnmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)wildlife monitoringwild pigs

Identifiers

PMID26784196
PMCPMC4732130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.