Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783722›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2016

Cis-regulatory programs in the development and evolution of vertebrate paired appendages.

Andrew R Gehrke, Neil H Shubin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein signaling and morphological development of the tail fluke in the embryonic beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas).Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The genetic basis of novel trait gain in walking fish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The rewiring of transcription circuits in evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R GehrkeDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: agehrke@uchicago.edu.
Neil H ShubinDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: nshubin@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental BiologyT32HD055164 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Sally Horne-Badovinac, Paschalis Kratsios · 2008 to 2026
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential gene expression is the core of development, mediating the genetic changes necessary for determining cell identity. The regulation of gene activity by cis-acting elements (e.g., enhancers) is a crucial mechanism for determining differential gene activity by precise control of gene expression in embryonic space and time. Modifications to regulatory regions can have profound impacts on phenotype, and therefore developmental and evolutionary biologists have increasingly focused on elucidating the transcriptional control of genes that build and pattern body plans. Here, we trace the evolutionary history of transcriptional control of three loci key to vertebrate appendage development (Fgf8, Shh, and HoxD/A). Within and across these regulatory modules, we find both complex and flexible regulation in contrast with more fixed enhancers that appear unchanged over vast timescales of vertebrate evolution. The transcriptional control of vertebrate appendage development was likely already incredibly complex in the common ancestor of fish, implying that subtle changes to regulatory networks were more likely responsible for alterations in phenotype rather than the de novo addition of whole regulatory domains. Finally, we discuss the dangers of relying on inter-species transgenesis when testing enhancer function, and call for more controlled regulatory swap experiments when inferring the evolutionary history of enhancer elements.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsExtremitiesFibroblast Growth Factor 8Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidVertebratesFibroblast Growth Factor 8Developmental systems driftEvo devoFin-to-limbGene regulationTopological domainTransgenesis

Identifiers

PMID26783722
PMCPMC5360378
OpenAlexW2280718105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.