Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783507›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

A single oral dose of Silodosin and Diclofenac sodium is effective in reducing pain after ureteric stent removal: a prospective, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled study.

Goto Gangkak, Ram Dayal Teli, Sher Singh Yadav, Vinay Tomar, Shivam Priyadarshi, Satinder Pal Aggarwal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Goto GangkakDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Ram Dayal TeliDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Sher Singh YadavDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Vinay TomarDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Shivam PriyadarshiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Satinder Pal AggarwalDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan India.
Sawai ManSingh Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective double-blinded placebo controlled randomized study was conducted in our institute to compare the efficacy of oral Silodosin, an alpha 1 selective antagonist and Diclofenac in relieving pain after stent removal. All patients with unilateral stent placement following renal and ureteric stone endoscopic surgery were randomized into four groups: group A (Placebo), group B (Diclofenac), group C (Silodosin) and group D (combination of Diclofenac and Silodosin). Visual analogue score (VAS score) and other relevant parameters were assessed during OPD visit. Patients were handed over randomized drug envelope and asked to take the medications one hour before the stent removal. Patients were contacted 24 h after stent removal and relevant parameters were recorded. The mean VAS scores were significantly decreased in Diclofenac (2.9), Silodosin (3.08) and combination group (2.85) when compared to placebo (4.20) (p < 0.001). However there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the treatment groups, i.e., group B, C and D (p > 0.5). Analgesics requirement and severe pain rates were not significantly reduced (p = 0.07, 0.35) in the three treatment groups when compared to placebo. Thus Silodosin and Diclofenac, both are effective in preventing pain after stent removal.

Indexed as

Diclofenac sodiumPainRenal stoneSilodosinStent removalUreteral stoneVisual analogue score

Identifiers

PMID26783507
PMCPMC4705058
OpenAlexW2222335404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.