Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783499›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2015

Use of Modeling and Simulation in the Design and Conduct of Pediatric Clinical Trials and the Optimization of Individualized Dosing Regimens.

C Stockmann, J S Barrett, J K Roberts, Cmt Sherwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Strategies for pediatric dose derivation from population pharmacokinetic models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Model-informed drug discovery and development approaches to inform clinical trial design and regulatory decisions: A primer for the MENA region.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Training the next generation of pharmacometric modelers: a multisector perspective.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C StockmannDepartment of Pediatrics University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA.
J S BarrettSanofi Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
J K RobertsDepartment of Pediatrics University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA.
Cmt SherwinDepartment of Pediatrics University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models of drug action and disease progression can inform pediatric pharmacotherapy. In this tutorial, we explore the key issues that differentiate pediatric from adult pharmacokinetic (PK) / pharmacodynamic (PD) studies, describe methods to calculate the number of participants to be enrolled and the optimal times at which blood samples should be collected, and therapeutic drug monitoring methods for individualizing pharmacotherapy. The development of pediatric-specific drug dosing dashboards is also highlighted, with an emphasis on clinical-relevance and ease of use.

Identifiers

PMID26783499
PMCPMC4716585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.