Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783373›Full record

ArticleWater, air, and soil pollution2016

Respiratory Health Effects of Ultrafine Particles in Children: A Literature Review.

Amy Heinzerling, Joy Hsu, Fuyuen Yip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water, air, and soil pollution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Route Choice in Children's Exposure to Ultrafine Particles Whilst Walking to School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Indoor endotoxin, proximity to a major roadway, and severe asthma exacerbations among children in Puerto Rico.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy HeinzerlingDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Moffitt Room 987, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Joy HsuEpidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Public Health Scientific Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F-60, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Fuyuen YipAir Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F-60, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By convention, airborne particles ≤0.1 μm (100 nm) are defined as ultrafine particles (UFPs). UFPs can comprise a large number of particles in particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm (PM

Indexed as

childparticulate matterrespiratory healthultrafine

Identifiers

PMID26783373
PMCPMC4714792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.