Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783029›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2016

Laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.

Y Li, S Wang, S Gao, C Yang, W Yang, S Guo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03765411 (Safe Surgery in the Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03765411 completednot on this map

Safe Surgery in the Elderly: A Review of Outcomes Following Robotic Proctectomy From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a Retrospective Cross Sectional Cohort Study. Cross-Sectional Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTripler Army Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled6,740ConditionsRectal CancerArmsProctectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Trends in Adoption, Outcomes, and Costs of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Population.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients.Annals of coloproctology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Cancer Hospital and Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. liyaoping1600@sina.com.
S WangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, No. 56 Xinjian Road South, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
S GaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Cancer Hospital and Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
C YangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Medical University, No. 56 Xinjian Road South, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.
W YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Cancer Hospital and Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
S GuoDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Cancer Hospital and Institute, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Octogenarians are more often viewed as high-risk surgical candidates. This increased risk is attributed to an age-related decline in physical function and reserve capacity coupled with the presence of various underlying diseases. There are no current guidelines or consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for this cohort of complex patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians. The meta-analysis was conducted following all aspects of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic literature review was carried out using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and OVID. Only studies comparing outcome of laparoscopic and open colorectal resections in the elderly population (≥80 years) were selected. The data collected included the patient demographics, interventions, observed outcome and sources of bias. When performing the statistical analysis, we used the odds ratio for categorical variables and the weighted mean difference for continuous variables. The results of this systematic review and pooled analysis demonstrated the safety and potential benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. LC can reduce the length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, time to return of normal bowel function, and incidence of postoperative pneumonia, wound infection, and postoperative ileus.

Indexed as

Age FactorsPatient SelectionAged, 80 and overColectomyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMalePatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic colorectal resectionMeta-analysisOctogenariansOpen colorectal resectionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26783029
OpenAlexW2296298344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.