Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26783011›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2016

Quantitative OCT and MRI biomarkers for the differentiation of cartilage degeneration.

Sven Nebelung, Nicolai Brill, Markus Tingart, Thomas Pufe, Christiane Kuhl, Holger Jahr, Daniel Truhn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of TFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sven NebelungDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. snebelung@ukaachen.de.
Nicolai BrillFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology, Aachen, Germany.
Markus TingartDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas PufeInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Holger JahrDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel TruhnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEFraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of quantitative parameters obtained by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the comprehensive assessment of human articular cartilage degeneration. MATERIALS AND

methodsHuman osteochondral samples of variable degeneration (n = 45) were obtained from total knee replacements and assessed by MRI sequences measuring T1, T1ρ, T2 and T2* relaxivity and by OCT-based quantification of irregularity (OII, optical irregularity index), homogeneity (OHI, optical homogeneity index]) and attenuation (OAI, optical attenuation index]). Samples were also assessed macroscopically (Outerbridge classification) and histologically (Mankin classification) as grade-0 (Mankin scores 0-4)/grade-I (scores 5-8)/grade-II (scores 9-10)/grade-III (score 11-14). After data normalisation, differences between Mankin grades and correlations between imaging parameters were assessed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test and Spearman's correlation coefficients, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities in the detection of Mankin grade-0 were calculated.

resultsSignificant degeneration-related increases were found for T2 and OII and decreases for OAI, while T1, T1ρ, T2* or OHI did not reveal significant changes in relation to degeneration. A number of significant correlations between imaging parameters and histological (sub)scores were found, in particular for T2 and OII. Sensitivities and specificities in the detection of Mankin grade-0 were highest for OHI/T1 and OII/T1ρ, respectively.

conclusionQuantitative OCT and MRI techniques seem to complement each other in the comprehensive assessment of cartilage degeneration. Sufficiently large structural and compositional changes in the extracellular matrix may thus be parameterized and quantified, while the detection of early degeneration remains challenging.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomarkersCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesFemaleHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Optical CoherenceBiomarkersCartilageMRIOCTOsteoarthritisParameterizationQuantification

Identifiers

PMID26783011
OpenAlexW2299470943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.