ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016
Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspectives from the SCOT-HEART Trial.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06552663 (The Diagnostic Power Of Coronary Ct Angiography In Patients With Chest Pain And Zero Calcium Score), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Diagnostic Power Of Coronary Ct Angiography In Patients With Chest Pain And Zero Calcium Score
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update in Perioperative Ischemic Workup: Integrating 2024 AHA/ACC Guidelines and Contemporary Evidence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Comparing the Performances of Support Vector Machines and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Coronary Artery Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Angiography and Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Preoperative Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced detection of subclinical coronary artery disease in athletes: diagnostic performance and limitations.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Charting the Unseen: How Non-Invasive Imaging Could Redefine Cardiovascular Prevention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Protein Corona Sensor Array Nanosystem for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep learning-based scan range optimization can reduce radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography.European radiology · 2024Article
- Review
- The Utility of CT Coronary Angiography in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.European cardiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Comparing downstream consequences of normal exercise stress echocardiograms and cardiac computed tomography angiography scans in patients suspected of having of obstructive coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study of Tricare beneficiaries.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Comparison on radiation effective dose and image quality of right coronary artery on prospective ECG-gated method between 320 row CT and 2nd generation (128-slice) dual source CT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Association between number of institutions with coronary computed tomography angiography and regional mortality ratio of acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide ecological study using a spatial Bayesian model.International journal of health geographics · 2018Observational
- Improved diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient in combination with morphological evaluation of coronary artery stenosis using 320-row computed tomography.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
- Efficacy of noninvasive cardiac imaging tests in diagnosis and management of stable coronary artery disease.Vascular health and risk management · 2017Review
- Simultaneous bright- and black-blood three-dimensional whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging for integrated coronary plaque detection and luminal stenosis assessment: A prospective comparison with coronary computed tomography angiography.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Many trials to date have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) when compared to the gold standard diagnostic test, invasive coronary angiography. However, whether the use of a non-invasive anatomical test, such as CCTA, can translate into improved patient risk stratification, management and outcome has yet to be established. The Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) trial sought to address these questions and determined whether CCTA, when used in addition to standard care, could aid the diagnosis, further investigation and treatment of patients referred to the cardiology clinic with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease. In this trial, CCTA clarified the diagnosis of angina due to coronary heart disease in a quarter of patients and this led to major alterations in treatment and management that appeared to reduce the risk of subsequent coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. The SCOT-Heart trial has established that CCTA is a valuable diagnostic test in patients with suspected angina pectoris due to coronary heart disease and leads to greater clarity, more focused appropriate treatments and better coronary heart disease outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.