ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016
Gene-Based Association Analysis for Censored Traits Via Fixed Effect Functional Regressions.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of quantitative pleiotropic traits for next-generation sequencing with multivariate functional linear models.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of Complex Diseases at Gene Level with Generalized Functional Linear Models.Genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Reversible jumps for the joint modeling of the dimension of pseudo-functional models in chromosomal windows in genome-wide selection.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genetic heterogeneity: Challenges, impacts, and methods through an associative lens.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Review
- Gene-level association analysis of ordinal traits with functional ordinal logistic regressions.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Article
- Gene-Based Association Testing of Dichotomous Traits With Generalized Functional Linear Mixed Models Using Extended Pedigrees: Applications to Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021Article
- Gene-based association analysis for bivariate time-to-event data through functional regression with copula models.Biometrics · 2020Article
- Gene-based association analysis of survival traits via functional regression-based mixed effect cox models for related samples.Genetic epidemiology · 2019Article
- Linear mixed models for association analysis of quantitative traits with next-generation sequencing data.Genetic epidemiology · 2019Article
- A comparison study of multivariate fixed models and Gene Association with Multiple Traits (GAMuT) for next-generation sequencing.Genetic epidemiology · 2017Article
- A Comparison Study of Fixed and Mixed Effect Models for Gene Level Association Studies of Complex Traits.Genetic epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic studies of survival outcomes have been proposed and conducted recently, but statistical methods for identifying genetic variants that affect disease progression are rarely developed. Motivated by our ongoing real studies, here we develop Cox proportional hazard models using functional regression (FR) to perform gene-based association analysis of survival traits while adjusting for covariates. The proposed Cox models are fixed effect models where the genetic effects of multiple genetic variants are assumed to be fixed. We introduce likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistics to test for associations between the survival traits and multiple genetic variants in a genetic region. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed Cox RF LRT statistics have well-controlled type I error rates. To evaluate power, we compare the Cox FR LRT with the previously developed burden test (BT) in a Cox model and sequence kernel association test (SKAT), which is based on mixed effect Cox models. The Cox FR LRT statistics have higher power than or similar power as Cox SKAT LRT except when 50%/50% causal variants had negative/positive effects and all causal variants are rare. In addition, the Cox FR LRT statistics have higher power than Cox BT LRT. The models and related test statistics can be useful in the whole genome and whole exome association studies. An age-related macular degeneration dataset was analyzed as an example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.