ArticleScientific reports2016
Prediction and characterization of protein-protein interaction network in Bacillus licheniformis WX-02.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering of a newly isolated Bacillus tequilensis BL01 for poly-γ-glutamic acid production from citric acid.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Computational Network Inference for Bacterial Interactomics.mSystems · 2022Review
- Predicting protein-protein interactions between banana and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 integrating sequence and domain homologous alignment and neural network verification.Proteome science · 2022Article
- Protein Integrated Network Analysis to Reveal Potential Drug Targets Against Extended Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis XDR1219.Molecular biotechnology · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of differential proteome-wide protein-protein interaction network ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2019Article
- Identification of drug target candidates of the swine pathogen Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by construction of protein-protein interaction network.Genes & genomics · 2018Article
- Article
- In silico identification of essential proteins in Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis based on protein-protein interaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we constructed a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of B. licheniformis strain WX-02 with interolog method and domain-based method, which contained 15,864 edges and 2,448 nodes. Although computationally predicted networks have relatively low coverage and high false-positive rate, our prediction was confirmed from three perspectives: local structural features, functional similarities and transcriptional correlations. Further analysis of the COG heat map showed that protein interactions in B. licheniformis WX-02 mainly occurred in the same functional categories. By incorporating the transcriptome data, we found that the topological properties of the PPI network were robust under normal and high salt conditions. In addition, 267 different protein complexes were identified and 117 poorly characterized proteins were annotated with certain functions based on the PPI network. Furthermore, the sub-network showed that a hub protein CcpA jointed directly or indirectly many proteins related to γ-PGA synthesis and regulation, such as PgsB, GltA, GltB, ProB, ProJ, YcgM and two signal transduction systems ComP-ComA and DegS-DegU. Thus, CcpA might play an important role in the regulation of γ-PGA synthesis. This study therefore will facilitate the understanding of the complex cellular behaviors and mechanisms of γ-PGA synthesis in B. licheniformis WX-02.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.