Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26782740›Full record

ArticleVaccine2016

Factors associated with a successful expansion of influenza vaccination among pregnant women in Nicaragua.

Carmen S Arriola, Nancy Vasconez, Mark Thompson, Sara Mirza, Ann C Moen, Joseph Bresee, Ivy Talavera, Alba María Ropero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Progress towards a comprehensive approach to maternal and neonatal immunization in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  16. Factors Associated With Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Real-World Evidence-Based Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmen S ArriolaEpidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: wus3@cdc.gov.
Nancy VasconezPan American Health Organization, Managua, Nicaragua.
Mark ThompsonInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sara MirzaInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ann C MoenInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joseph BreseeInfluenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ivy TalaveraPan American Health Organization, Managua, Nicaragua.
Alba María RoperoPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U51 GH001191CGH CDC HHS U51GH001191Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women are at risk of severe influenza disease and are a priority group for influenza vaccination programs. Nicaragua expanded recommendations to include influenza vaccination to all pregnant women in the municipality of Managua in 2013.

methodsWe carried out a survey among 1,807 pregnant women who delivered at public hospitals in the municipality of Managua to evaluate the uptake of influenza vaccination and factors associated with vaccination.

resultsWe observed a high (71%) uptake of influenza vaccination among this population, with no differences observed by age, education or parity of the women. Having four antenatal visits and five or more visits were associated with receipt of influenza vaccination (AORs: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.15, 5.81, and 2.37; 95% CI: 1.12, 5.0, respectively). Also, receipt of influenza vaccination recommendation from a health care provider was positively associated with receipt of influenza vaccination (AOR: 14.22; 95% CI: 10.45, 19.33).

conclusionsThe successful expansion of influenza vaccination among pregnant women in the municipality of Managua may be due to ready access to free medical care and health care providers' recommendation for vaccination at health care clinics that received influenza vaccine.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAdolescentAdultFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesNicaraguaPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesAcceptabilityInfluenza vaccinationPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID26782740
PMCPMC5699213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.