Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26782335›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2016

Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology--concept and controversy.

Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Gaël Chételat, Dennis Dickson, Anne M Fagan, Giovanni B Frisoni, William Jagust, Elizabeth C Mormino, Ronald C Petersen, Reisa A Sperling and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Diagnostic value of amyloid-PET and tau-PET: a head-to-head comparison.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Primary age-related tauopathy.Acta neuropathologica · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Clifford R JackDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
David S KnopmanDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Gaël ChételatINSERM, Université de Caen, EPHE, CHU de Caen, U1077, Caen, France.
Dennis DicksonDepartment of Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Anne M FaganDepartment of Neurology, Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 4488 Forest Park Avenue, Suite 101, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
Giovanni B FrisoniUniversity Hospitals and University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Genève, Switzerland.
William JagustHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, 175 Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Elizabeth C MorminoDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Ronald C PetersenDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Reisa A SperlingDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Victor L VillemagneDepartment of Molecular Imaging &Therapy, Centre for PET, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, PO Box 5555 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3084.
Pieter J VisserDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
Stephanie J B VosDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
Mayo Clinic · USMaastricht University · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAustin Health · AUÉcole Pratique des Hautes Études · FRHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Geneva · CHWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Vascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CAROL A. DERBY · 1985 to 2026
$73.9M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
SUPPLEMENT TO ALZHEIMERS DISEASE PATIENT REGISTRYU01AG006786 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRAFF-RADFORD, JONATHAN, JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1986 to 2023
$49.6M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
THE PGRN/TDP-43 AXIS IN ALZHEIMER?S DISEASE AND NEURODEGENERATIONP50AG016574 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VEMURI, PRASHANTHI · 1999 to 2018
$36.9M
PREDICTING ALZHEIMERS DISEASE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCER01AG011378 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1993 to 2017
$12.1M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Neuropathology CoreP50NS072187 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI DICKSON, DENNIS WILLIAM · 2010 to 2017
$8.7M
Validating the New Criteria for Preclinical Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG041851 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JACK, CLIFFORD R., KNOPMAN, DAVID S · 2012 to 2021
$6.3M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003949NIA NIH HHS P01‑AG003949NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016574NIA NIH HHS P50‑AG016574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG011378NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041851NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006786NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS072187NINDS NIH HHS P50‑NS072187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology (SNAP) is a biomarker-based concept that applies to individuals with normal levels of amyloid-β biomarkers in the brain, but in whom biomarkers of neurodegeneration are abnormal. The term SNAP has been applied to clinically normal individuals (who do not meet criteria for either mild cognitive impairment or dementia) and to individuals with mild cognitive impairment, but is applicable to any amyloid-negative, neurodegeneration-positive individual regardless of clinical status, except when the pathology underlying neurodegeneration can be reliably inferred from the clinical presentation. SNAP is present in ∼23% of clinically normal individuals aged >65 years and in ∼25% of mildly cognitively impaired individuals. APOE*ε4 is underrepresented in individuals with SNAP compared with amyloid-positive individuals. Clinically normal and mildly impaired individuals with SNAP have worse clinical and/or cognitive outcomes than individuals with normal levels of neurodegeneration and amyloid-β biomarkers. In this Perspectives article, we describe the available data on SNAP and address topical controversies in the field.

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersBrainCognition DisordersHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26782335
PMCPMC4784257
OpenAlexW2291435159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.