Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26782184›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2012

Enterococcus faecium AL 41: Its Enterocin M and Their Beneficial Use in Rabbits Husbandry.

Andrea Lauková, L'ubica Chrastinová, Monika Pogány Simonová, Viola Strompfová, Iveta Plachá, Klaudia Čobanová, Zuzana Formelová, Mária Chrenková, L'ubomír Ondruška

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of the ProbioticLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Influence of Immune Parameters afterLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Autochtonous StrainAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea LaukováSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia. laukova@saske.sk.
L'ubica ChrastinováAnimal Production Research Centre, Nitra-Lužianky, Hlohovecká 2, 949 00, Nitra, Slovakia. chrastinova@cvzv.sk.
Monika Pogány SimonováSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia. simonova@saske.sk.
Viola StrompfováSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia. strompfv@saske.sk.
Iveta PlacháSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia. placha@saske.sk.
Klaudia ČobanováSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia. boldik@saske.sk.
Zuzana FormelováAnimal Production Research Centre, Nitra-Lužianky, Hlohovecká 2, 949 00, Nitra, Slovakia. formelova@cvzv.sk.
Mária ChrenkováAnimal Production Research Centre, Nitra-Lužianky, Hlohovecká 2, 949 00, Nitra, Slovakia. chrenkova@cvzv.sk.
L'ubomír OndruškaAnimal Production Research Centre, Nitra-Lužianky, Hlohovecká 2, 949 00, Nitra, Slovakia. ondruska@cvzv.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are ubiquitous microbiota constituting a large proportion of autochthonous microflora in animals. Some produce bacteriocins mostly enterocins; some of bacteriocin-producing strains also possess probiotic properties. Enterococcus faecium AL 41, Ent M-producing strain was tested for beneficial effect in rabbits. Five-week-old animals (72, Hycole) were divided into experimental groups (E1, E2) and control (C); 24 animals in each. Rabbits in E1 were administered AL 41 (500 μl per animal/day, 10(9) cfu/ml) in water for 21 days; rabbits in E2 were administered Ent M (50 μl/animal/day, activity 12,800 AU/ml) in water for 21 days. Rabbits in C fed a commercial diet. The experiment lasted 42 days. Sampling of faeces and blood was provided on day 0-1 and 21, 42; 3 animals per group were slaughtered. Caecum and appendix were separated. AL 41 colonized rabbits intestines <1.0 (log10) cfu/g, but stimulation of immunity was noted (P < 0.01; P < 0.001). Antimicrobial activity of both was noticed in faeces and/or caecum against pseudomonads. Significant decrease of coliform bacteria in faeces of E1 was noted on day 42 comparing with E2 (P < 0.05). On day 21, S. aureus cells were not detected in E1, E2. On day 42, S. aureus was not found in E2; in E1 their counts were <1.0 cfu/g, while in C it was in the count more than 1.0 cfu/g. In appendix, on day 21, significant decrease of not specified bacteria was found in E1, E2 comparing with C (P < 0.01). Administration of additives has not evoked oxidative stress. Biochemical parameters were not influenced. Higher average daily weight gains were detected by both, AL 41 and Ent M.

Indexed as

BenefityEnterocin MEnterococcus faeciumRabbit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.