Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26782093›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Meropenem dosing requirements against Enterobacteriaceae in critically ill patients: influence of renal function, geographical area and presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases.

A Isla, A Canut, J Arribas, E Asín-Prieto, A Rodríguez-Gascón

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Dosing Requirements AgainstDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A IslaPharmacokinetics, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
A CanutMicrobiology Service, Hospital Universitario de Álava (HUA), Servicio Vasco de Salud Osakidetza, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
J ArribasMicrobiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Zaragoza, Spain.
E Asín-PrietoPharmacokinetics, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
A Rodríguez-GascónPharmacokinetics, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. alicia.rodriguez@ehu.eus.
University of the Basque Country · ESOsakidetza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the influence of the susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, specifically the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and the geographical area (Europe and USA), on the meropenem dosing requirements in critically ill patients with different degrees of renal function by estimation of the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment. Additionally, estimation of the PK/PD breakpoints according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) approach was also an objective. Six dosing regimens were evaluated: 0.5 g, 1 g and 2 g every 8 h given as 0.5-h or 3-h infusions. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from the literature, and susceptibility data to meropenem for E. coli and K. pneumoniae were collected from the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) surveillance study. For the same dose level, the 3-h infusion provided a probability of target attainment (PTA) ≥90 % for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values up to two-fold dilution higher than those obtained with the 0.5-h infusion. For E. coli, the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was 100 % in most cases, and neither the dose nor the infusion length nor the geographical area significantly affected the probability to reach the target. With regards to K. pneumoniae, the CFR increased when increasing the dose and decreasing the creatinine clearance (CLCR). The CFR for Spanish and USA strains was higher than that calculated for European strains. Meropenem PK/PD breakpoints are dependent on the dose, infusion length and CLCR, ranging from 2 to 32 mg/L. Based on our results, meropenem administered as a extended infusion is the best option to treat infections due to E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCritical IllnessDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEuropeFemaleGeographyHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesMeropenemThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID26782093
OpenAlexW2290106633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.