Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781852›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2012

Comparison of the Potency of the Lipid II Targeting Antimicrobials Nisin, Lacticin 3147 and Vancomycin Against Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Catalin Iancu, Aoife Grainger, Des Field, Paul D Cotter, Colin Hill, R Paul Ross

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catalin IancuFaculty of Food Science and Engineering, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, 111 Domneasca, 800201, Galati, Romania.
Aoife GraingerDepartment of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Des FieldDepartment of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland. paul.cotter@teagasc.ie.
Colin HillDepartment of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. c.hill@ucc.ie.
R Paul RossTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
University College Cork · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While nisin (lantibiotic), lacticin 3147 (lantibiotic) and vancomycin (glycopeptides) are among the best studied lipid II-binding antimicrobials, their relative activities have never been compared. Nisin and lacticin 3147 have been employed/investigated primarily as food preservatives, although they do have potential in terms of veterinary and clinical applications. Vancomycin is used exclusively in clinical therapy. We reveal a higher potency for lacticin 3147 (MIC 0.95-3.8 μg/ml) and vancomycin (MIC 0.78-1.56 μg/ml) relative to that of nisin (MIC 6.28-25.14 μg/ml) against the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. A comparison of the activity of the three antimicrobials against nisin resistance mutants of L. monocytogenes also reveals that their susceptibility to vancomycin and lacticin 3147 changed only slightly or not at all. A further assessment of relative activity against a selection of Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus and Staphylococcus aureus targets revealed that vancomycin MICs consistently ranged between 0.78 and 1.56 μg/ml against all but one strain. Lacticin 3147 was found to be more effective than nisin against B. cereus (lacticin 3147 MIC 1.9-3.8 μg/ml; nisin MIC 4.1-16.7 μg/ml) and E. faecium and E. faecalis targets (lacticin 3147 MIC from 1.9 to 3.8 μg/ml; nisin MIC ≥8.3 μg/ml). The greater effectiveness of lacticin 3147 is even more impressive when expressed as molar values. However, in agreement with the previous reports, nisin was the more effective of the two lantibiotics against S. aureus strains. This study highlights that in many instances the antimicrobial activity of these leading lantibiotics are comparable with that of vancomycin and emphasizes their particular value with respect to use in situations including foods and veterinary medicine, where the use of vancomycin is not permitted.

Indexed as

AntimicrobialBacteriocinLacticin 3147LantibioticNisinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26781852
OpenAlexW2094288877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.