Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781837›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2016

Emergency imaging after a mass casualty incident: role of the radiology department during training for and activation of a disaster management plan.

Ferco H Berger, Markus Körner, Mark P Bernstein, Aaron D Sodickson, Ludo F Beenen, Patrick D McLaughlin, Digna R Kool, Ronald M Bilow

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Emergency medical rescue in debris flow disaster.American journal of medicine open · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Emergency radiology: roadmap for radiology departments.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Coronavirus Outbreak: Is Radiology Ready? Mass Casualty Incident Planning.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Ferco H Berger1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-2554
Markus Körner2 Radiologie Mühleninsel, Landshut, Germany.
Mark P Bernstein3 Trauma & Emergency Radiology, Bellevue Hospital & NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron D Sodickson4 Emergency Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ludo F Beenen5 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Patrick D McLaughlin6 Emergency Radiology Division, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Digna R Kool7 Department of Radiology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, Netherlands.
Ronald M Bilow8 Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
University of British Columbia · CAAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USTexas Medical Center · USUniversity of Applied Sciences Landshut · DEZiekenhuis Bernhoven · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the setting of mass casualty incidents (MCIs), hospitals need to divert from normal routine to delivering the best possible care to the largest number of victims. This should be accomplished by activating an established hospital disaster management plan (DMP) known to all staff through prior training drills. Over the recent decades, imaging has increasingly been used to evaluate critically ill patients. It can also be used to increase the accuracy of triaging MCI victims, since overtriage (falsely higher triage category) and undertriage (falsely lower triage category) can severely impact resource availability and mortality rates, respectively. This article emphasizes the importance of including the radiology department in hospital preparations for a MCI and highlights factors expected to influence performance during hospital DMP activation including issues pertinent to effective simulation, such as establishing proper learning objectives. After-action reviews including performance evaluation and debriefing on issues are invaluable following simulation drills and DMP activation, in order to improve subsequent preparedness. Historically, most hospital DMPs have not adequately included radiology department operations, and they have not or to a little extent been integrated in the DMP activation simulation. This article aims to increase awareness of the need for radiology department engagement in order to increase radiology department preparedness for DMP activation after a MCI occurs.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMass Casualty IncidentsRadiology Department, HospitalDiagnostic ImagingDisaster PlanningEmergenciesHumansTriage

Identifiers

PMID26781837
PMCPMC4985477
OpenAlexW2272773198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.