ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2012
Development of Freeze-Dried Bacteriocin-Containing Preparations from Lactic Acid Bacteria to Inhibit Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- IntratumorCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Capacity of Bacteria Isolated from Stingless Bee (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial Activity of Six International Artisanal Kefirs AgainstMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Anti-Staphylococcal Enterotoxinogenesis ofFood technology and biotechnology · 2017Article
- Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in Hot Dogs by Surface Application of Freeze-Dried Bacteriocin-Containing Powders from Lactic Acid Bacteria.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2016Article
- Production of Antilisterial Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria in Dairy-Based Media: A Comparative Study.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a recent movement to produce and consume "minimally processed" and more "natural" foods through the use of fewer chemical preservatives. The shift to more "natural" foods has resulted in a great interest in the use of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria as natural biopreservatives. The objective of this comparative study was to identify bacteriocins that can be produced in low-cost or no-cost dairy-based media (DBM), concentrated using freeze-drying, and applied to Cheddar cheese samples to concurrently inhibit Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. Select bacteriocin producers were grown in DBM, their cell-free supernatants (CFS) were frozen, and the frozen CFS samples were freeze-dried to produce bacteriocin-containing powders. Cheddar cheese samples were challenged with L. monocytogenes or Staph. aureus cells. The challenged samples were exposed to buffered solutions of freeze-dried powders containing bacteriocins, incubated at 4 °C for 24-72 h, and plated onto appropriate selective media. All freeze-dried bacteriocin-containing powders tested were active against L. monocytogenes and Staph. aureus. Our research findings indicated that low-cost or no-cost DBM could successfully be used for production of bacteriocin-containing preparations. In addition, freeze-drying was determined to be a feasible approach to prepare concentrated and stable bacteriocin-containing powders for prospective food applications. The prevention of even a very small percentage of foodborne illnesses via the use of bacteriocins as natural biopreservatives would help reduce the number of foodborne illness-related hospitalizations, deaths, and financial loss due to medical expenses, lost income/productivity, cost of litigation/penalties, and loss of trade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26781734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.