Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781656›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2016

Desensitization Strategies Pre- and Post-Cardiac Transplantation.

Robert M Cole, Jon A Kobashigawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updates on Heart Transplantation.Current heart failure reports · 2019
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in the immunology of heart transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert M ColeCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. Coler@cshs.org.
Jon A KobashigawaCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. Kobashigawaj@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPanel reactive antibody (PRA) testing has become standard in the evaluation of patients prior to cardiac transplant. Sensitizing events such as blood transfusions, which result in the accumulation of pre-transplant antibodies, should be avoided as clinically feasible. Desensitization therapy might be considered in sensitized patients with cPRA > 50 % although distinct cutoff PRA values for initiating therapy pre-transplant are patient and transplant program dependent. Post-cardiac transplant, quantitative antibodies should also be periodically analyzed, at intervals individualized to the patient. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after cardiac transplantation have been shown to be associated with worsened survival. It appears that complement fixing DSA confer the greatest risk for antibody-mediated rejection post-transplant. Desensitization strategies aim to reduce the number of clinically important antibodies prior to and after transplant, both by removal of antibodies and cessation of further production. Current desensitization regimens include pharmacologic, procedural, and surgical modalities, and must be individualized to the patient. Currently, most cardiac transplant programs tailor the post-transplant immunosuppressive regimen based on clinical factors and immunologic assays and may include the use of cytolytic induction and/or intravenous immune gammaglobulin in higher risk patients.

Indexed as

DesensitizationHeartHeart transplantRituximabSensitizationTransplant

Identifiers

PMID26781656
OpenAlexW2272823768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.