Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781640›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2016

Reliability of signal transmission in stochastic nerve axon equations.

Martin Sauer, Wilhelm Stannat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin SauerInstitut für Mathematik, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17, Juni 136, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Wilhelm StannatInstitut für Mathematik, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17, Juni 136, 10623, Berlin, Germany. stannat@math.tu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a method for computing probabilities for spontaneous activity and propagation failure of the action potential in spatially extended, conductance-based neuronal models subject to noise, based on statistical properties of the membrane potential. We compare different estimators with respect to the quality of detection, computational costs and robustness and propose the integral of the membrane potential along the axon as an appropriate estimator to detect both spontaneous activity and propagation failure. Performing a model reduction we achieve a simplified analytical expression based on the linearization at the resting potential (resp. the traveling action potential). This allows to approximate the probabilities for spontaneous activity and propagation failure in terms of (classical) hitting probabilities of one-dimensional linear stochastic differential equations. The quality of the approximation with respect to the noise amplitude is discussed and illustrated with numerical results for the spatially extended Hodgkin-Huxley equations. Python simulation code is supplied on GitHub under the link https://github.com/deristnochda/Hodgkin-Huxley-SPDE.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalStochastic ProcessesAction PotentialsAnimalsAxonsComputer SimulationNeuronsReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionHodgkin-Huxley equationsStochastic spatial model neuron

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.