Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781240›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2010

The Effect of Various Probiotic Strains or Avilamycin Feed Additive on Immune Defense Markers and Acute-Phase Response to Salmonella Infection in Chickens.

Maria Bielecka, Wanda Smoragiewicz, Andrzej K Siwicki, Roman Wójcik, Elżbieta Biedrzycka, Andrzej Orłowski, Signe Kask, Jan Jankowski, Barbara Karska-Wysocki, Daniela Ham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Effect of Orally Administered Multi-Strain Probiotic Formulation (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria BieleckaDepartment of Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Tuwima 10, 10-747, Olsztyn, Poland.
Wanda SmoragiewiczDepartment of Biology Sciences, Université du Québec, C.P. 8888, succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Andrzej K SiwickiDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Roman WójcikDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Elżbieta BiedrzyckaDepartment of Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Tuwima 10, 10-747, Olsztyn, Poland.
Andrzej OrłowskiDepartment of Food Microbiology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Tuwima 10, 10-747, Olsztyn, Poland.
Signe KaskEU Centre of Excellence CENEXFOOD, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Tuwima 10, 10-747, Olsztyn, Poland.
Jan JankowskiDepartment of Poultry Science, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animals, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
Barbara Karska-WysockiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Daniela HamCHUM l'Hôtel-Dieu, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 3830 rue St. Urbain, Pav. Jeanne Mance, Rm. 7-134, Montreal, QC, H2W 1T8, Canada. hamdaniela@yahoo.com.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are a nutritional tool for disease prevention. It has been proposed that stimulation of immune response could affect the growth-promoting properties of antimicrobial growth promoters as well as the control of foodborne pathogens. The current study compares immune response in the blood of 280 non-infected and Salmonella-infected chickens fed either with the growth promoter avilamycin or with one of five probiotic strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which also showed growth-promoting properties. All of the probiotic strains stimulated superoxide anion production and the proliferation of leukocytes, while raising lysozyme and γ-globulin levels (by up to 65%, p < 0.01), which are important factors in native and cell-mediated immune defense against pathogens. In contrast, among the two strains examined, specific Salmonella antibodies were induced only by L. salivarius, and not by B. animalis, as assessed by the ELISA method and confirmed by an agglutination reaction (p < 0.05). In the avilamycin-fed group, both non-infected and infected chickens showed decreased levels of these immune markers (by 30%) and increased levels of ceruloplasmin by up to 35%. In contrast, the probiotics suppressed acute-phase response assessed by ceruloplasmin by up to 32%. This correlation implies that various antimicrobial feed additives have a distinct effect on immunomodulation, which may affect different mechanisms in the nutrition-related metabolism associated with the rate of weight gain in chickens. The data could contribute to the design of innovative antimicrobial feed additives in the food industry and consequently to well-being of humans.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial feed additivesNon-specific immunityPoultryProbioticsSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID26781240
OpenAlexW2075436907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.