Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26781075›Full record

ReviewJournal of vascular surgery2016

Establishment of a rat and guinea pig aortic interposition graft model reveals model-specific patterns of intimal hyperplasia.

Elaine K Gregory, Janet M Vercammen, Megan E Flynn, Melina R Kibbe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vascular surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inhibiting intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic vascular grafts via immobilized all-trans retinoic acid.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elaine K GregoryDivision of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Simpson Querrey Institute for Bionanotechnology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Janet M VercammenDivision of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Simpson Querrey Institute for Bionanotechnology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Megan E FlynnDivision of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Simpson Querrey Institute for Bionanotechnology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Melina R KibbeDivision of Vascular Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Simpson Querrey Institute for Bionanotechnology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill; Section of Vascular Surgery, Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: mkibbe@nmh.org.
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Vascular Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32HL094293 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ESKANDARI, MARK K · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
Improving Graft Patency: A Novel L-Ascorbic Acid ePTFE ModificationF32HL114255 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREGORY, ELAINE KATHRYN · 2013 to 2013
$59k
Bioengineering Catalytically Active Grafts for Vascular SurgeryI01BX002282 · VA · JESSE BROWN VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KIBBE, MELINA RAE · 2015 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002282NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL114255NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the aortic interposition bypass model has been widely used to evaluate biomaterials for bypass grafting, there is no comprehensive description of the procedure or of the distribution of intimal hyperplasia that results. The objectives of this study were to (1) review and summarize approaches of aortic interposition grafting in animal models, (2) determine the pertinent anatomy for this procedure, (3) validate this model in the rat and guinea pig, and (4) compare the distribution of intimal hyperplasia that develops in each species.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed from 1980 to the present to analyze the use of anesthesia, anticoagulation, antiplatelet agents, graft material, suture, and anastomotic techniques. Using 10-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats and Hartley guinea pigs, we established pertinent aortic anatomy, developed comparable models, and assessed complications for each model. At 30 days, the graft and associated aorta were explanted, intimal formation was assessed morphometrically, and cellularity was assessed via nuclear counting.

resultsWe reviewed 30 articles and summarized the pertinent procedural findings. Upon establishing both animal models, key anatomic differences between the species that affect this model were noted. Guinea pigs have a much larger cecum, increased retroperitoneal fat, and lack the iliolumbar vessels compared with the rat. Surgical outcomes for the rat model included a 53% technical success rate and a 32% technical error rate. Surgical outcomes for the guinea pig model included a 69% technical success rate and a 31% technical error rate. These two species demonstrated unique distribution of intimal hyperplasia at 30 days. Intimal hyperplasia in the rat model was greatest at two areas, the proximal graft (5400 μm

conclusionsIn this report, we summarize the literature on the aortic interposition graft model, present a detailed description of the anatomy and aortic interposition graft procedure in the rat and guinea pig, and describe a unique distribution of intimal formation that results in both species. This information will be helpful when designing studies to evaluate novel graft materials in the future.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisNeointimaAnimalsAortaBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationGuinea PigsHyperplasiaMaterials TestingModels, AnimalProsthesis DesignRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26781075
PMCPMC4939129
OpenAlexW2224746006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.