Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26780564›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2016

Therapist and client discussions of drinking and coping: a sequential analysis of therapy dialogues in three evidence-based alcohol use disorder treatments.

Molly Magill, Justin Walthers, Nadine R Mastroleo, Jacques Gaume, Richard Longabaugh, Timothy R Apodaca

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improvement in therapist skills over sessions in brief motivational interventions predicts client language and alcohol use outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Molly MagillCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Justin WalthersCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Nadine R MastroleoCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jacques GaumeCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Richard LongabaughCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Timothy R ApodacaChildren's Mercy Kansas City, MO, USA.
Brown University · USMercy Research · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Within- and Post-Session Change Mechanisms in Treatment for Alcohol Use DisordersK23AA018126 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2010 to 2014
$684k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA018126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsResearch into the active ingredients of behavioral interventions for alcohol use disorders (AUD) has focused upon treatment-specific factors, often yielding disappointing results. The present study examines common factors of change in motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy and 12-Step facilitation therapy by (1) estimating transitional probabilities between therapist behaviors and subsequent client Change (CT) and Sustain (ST) Talk and (2) examining therapist skillfulness as a potential predictor of transition probability magnitude.

designSecondary data analysis examined temporal associations in therapy dialogues.

settingUnited States: data were from Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Homogeneity) (1997).

participantsOne hundred and twenty-six participants who received motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy or 12-Step facilitation therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Therapist behaviors were measured in three categories (exploring, teaching, connecting) and client statements included five categories (CT-distal, ST-distal, CT-proximal, ST-proximal, neutral). Therapist skillfulness was measured using a five-point ordinal scale.

findingsRelative to chance, therapist exploratory behaviors predicted subsequent client discussion of distal, drinking behavior [odds ratio (OR) = 1.37-1.78, P < 0.001] while suppressing discussion of proximal coping and neutral content (OR = 0.83-0.90, P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, therapist teaching suppressed distal drinking language (OR = 0.48-0.53, P < 0.001) and predicted neutral content (OR = 1.45, P < 0.001). Connecting behaviors increased both drinking and coping language, particularly language in favor of change (CT OR = 1.15-1.84, P < 0.001). Analyses of exploring and connecting skillfulness revealed that high skillfulness maximized these behaviors effect on client responses, but not teaching skillfulness.

conclusionsIn motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and 12-Step facilitation therapy for alcohol use disorders, the therapists who explore and connect with clients appear to be more successful at eliciting discussion about change than therapists who engage in teaching behavior. Therapists who are more skilled achieve better results than those who are less skilled.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAlcohol DrinkingCognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivational InterviewingProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAlcoholismEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleProcess Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicactive ingredientsAlcohol treatmentchange talkmechanisms of behavior changeprocess researchsequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID26780564
PMCPMC4861699
OpenAlexW2287651724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.