Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26780505›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Clinical safety of tbo-filgrastim, a short-acting human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Ruth Pettengell, Peter Bias, Udo Mueller, Nicole Lang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  3. Real-world safety experience of tevagrastim/ratiograstim/biograstim and tbo-filgrastim, short-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth PettengellDepartment of Haematology, St. George's Hospital, St. George's, University of London, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0RE, UK. rpetteng@sgul.ac.uk.
Peter BiasTeva ratiopharm/Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ulm, Germany.
Udo MuellerTeva ratiopharm/Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ulm, Germany.
Nicole LangTeva ratiopharm/Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ulm, Germany.
Teva Pharmaceuticals (Germany) · DESt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) known as filgrastim (Tevagrastim(®), Ratiograstim(®), Biograstim(®)) in Europe (approved in 2008) and tbo-filgrastim (Granix(®)) in the USA (approved in 2012; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petach Tikva, Israel) is indicated to reduce the duration of severe neutropenia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia. This article presents pooled clinical data for tbo-filgrastim compared with Neupogen(®) (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) as well as tbo-filgrastim post-marketing safety data. The safety and efficacy of tbo-filgrastim were evaluated in three phase III studies in 677 patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and study drug (348 patients with breast cancer, 237 with lung cancer, 92 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma). In each study, the efficacy of tbo-filgrastim was similar to that of Neupogen. Overall, 633 (93.5 %) patients receiving the study drug experienced 6093 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), most of which were related to chemotherapy. Adverse events related to the study drug (tbo-filgrastim or Neupogen) were experienced by 185 (27.3 %) patients; 19 (2.8 %) had severe drug-related AEs, 5 (0.7 %) had drug-related serious AEs, and 6 (0.9 %) discontinued the study due to drug-related AEs. Overall, the most common drug-related AEs were bone pain (7.1 %), myalgia (4.0 %), and asthenia (4.4 %). The post-marketing safety profile of tbo-filgrastim was consistent with that observed during the clinical studies. The availability of tbo-filgrastim, a G-CSF with safety and efficacy comparable to those of Neupogen, provides physicians with an alternative treatment option for supportive care of patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematologic AgentsHumansMaleNeoplasmsNeutropeniaAntineoplastic AgentsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematologic AgentsAdverse drug eventDrug toxicityFilgrastimGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorNeutropeniaSafety

Identifiers

PMID26780505
OpenAlexW2255734180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.