Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779921›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Detection by PCR of pathogenic protozoa in raw and drinkable water samples in Colombia.

Jessica Triviño-Valencia, Fabiana Lora, Juan David Zuluaga, Jorge E Gomez-Marin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Prevalence ofBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cryptosporidiosis outbreak in Amazonia, French Guiana, 2018.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Parasite epidemiology and control · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica Triviño-ValenciaGrupo GEPAMOL, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Quindio, Av. Bolivar 12N, Armenia, Quindio, Colombia.
Fabiana LoraGrupo GEPAMOL, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Quindio, Av. Bolivar 12N, Armenia, Quindio, Colombia.
Juan David ZuluagaGrupo GEPAMOL, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Quindio, Av. Bolivar 12N, Armenia, Quindio, Colombia.
Jorge E Gomez-MarinGrupo GEPAMOL, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Quindio, Av. Bolivar 12N, Armenia, Quindio, Colombia. gepamol2@uniquindio.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6472-3329
University of Quindío · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the presence of DNA of Giardia, Toxoplasma, and Cryptosporidium by PCR, and of Giardia and Cryptosporidium genera by immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), in water samples, before, during, and after plant treatment for drinkable water. We applied this method in 38 samples of 10 l of water taken from each of the water treatment steps and in 8 samples taken at home (only for Toxoplasma PCR) in Quindio region in Colombia. There were 8 positive samples for Cryptosporidium parvum (21 %), 4 for Cryptosporidium hominis (10.5 %), 27 for Toxoplasma gondii (58.6 %), 2 for Giardia duodenalis assemblage A (5.2 %), and 5 for G. duodenalis assemblage B (13.1 %). By IFAT, 23 % were positive for Giardia and 21 % for Cryptosporidium. An almost perfect agreement was found between IFAT and combined results of PCR, by Kappa composite proportion analysis. PCR positive samples were significantly more frequent in untreated raw water for C. parvum (p = 0.02). High mean of fecal coliforms, high pH values, and low mean of chlorine residuals were strongly correlated with PCR positivity for G. duodenalis assemblage B. High pH value was correlated with PCR positivity for C. parvum. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences was possible, showing water and human clinical sequences for Toxoplasma within the same phylogenetic group for B1 repeated sequence. PCR assay is complementary to IFAT assay for monitoring of protozoa in raw and drinkable water, enabling species identification and to look for phylogenetic analysis in protozoa from human and environmental sources.

Indexed as

Water PurificationAnimalsBase SequenceColombiaCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumDNA, ProtozoanDrinking WaterFecesFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectGiardia lambliaGiardiasisHumansPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan ProteinsDNA, ProtozoanDrinking WaterProtozoan ProteinsColombiaCryptosporidiumGiardiaPCRProtozoaToxoplasmaWaterborne diseases

Identifiers

PMID26779921
OpenAlexW2287785866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.