Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779879›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

A Mouse Model for Laser-induced Choroidal Neovascularization.

Ronil S Shah, Brian T Soetikno, Michelle Lajko, Amani A Fawzi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. AAV-NRF2 protects retinal and choroidal vasculature in a GDF15-dependent manner in an oxidative damage model of AMD.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronil S ShahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Brian T SoetiknoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Michelle LajkoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Amani A FawziDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; amani.fawzi@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Multimodal Retinal Functional Imaging for Diabetic RetinopathyR01EY019951 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAWZI, AMANI A, JIAO, SHULIANG · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Functional Retinal Imaging to Monitor Pharmaco-Therapies in Diabetic RetinopathyDP3DK108248 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI FAWZI, AMANI A, ZHANG, HAO F · 2015 to 2015
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS NIH-EY019951NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019951NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK108248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model has been a crucial mainstay model for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) research. By administering targeted laser injury to the RPE and Bruch's membrane, the procedure induces angiogenesis, modeling the hallmark pathology observed in neovascular AMD. First developed in non-human primates, the laser-induced CNV model has come to be implemented into many other species, the most recent of which being the mouse. Mouse experiments are advantageously more cost-effective, experiments can be executed on a much faster timeline, and they allow the use of various transgenic models. The miniature size of the mouse eye, however, poses a particular challenge when performing the procedure. Manipulation of the eye to visualize the retina requires practice of fine dexterity skills as well as simultaneous hand-eye-foot coordination to operate the laser. However, once mastered, the model can be applied to study many aspects of neovascular AMD such as molecular mechanisms, the effect of genetic manipulations, and drug treatment effects. The laser-induced CNV model, though useful, is not a perfect model of the disease. The wild-type mouse eye is otherwise healthy, and the chorio-retinal environment does not mimic the pathologic changes in human AMD. Furthermore, injury-induced angiogenesis does not reflect the same pathways as angiogenesis occurring in an age-related and chronic disease state as in AMD. Despite its shortcomings, the laser-induced CNV model is one of the best methods currently available to study the debilitating pathology of neovascular AMD. Its implementation has led to a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of AMD, as well as contributing to the development of many of the AMD therapies currently available.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBruch MembraneChoroidal NeovascularizationFluorescent Antibody TechniqueLasersMacular DegenerationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRetina

Identifiers

PMID26779879
PMCPMC4780856
OpenAlexW2215603353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.