Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779689›Full record

SynthesisSexually transmitted diseases2016

Linkage and Referral to HIV and Other Medical and Social Services: A Focused Literature Review for Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention and Control Programs.

Marion W Carter, Hsiu Wu, Stephanie Cohen, Lisa Hightow-Weidman, Shirley Lee Lecher, Philip J Peters

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marion W CarterFrom the Divisions of *STD Prevention and †HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA; ‡San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA; and §School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Hsiu Wu
Stephanie Cohen
Lisa Hightow-Weidman
Shirley Lee Lecher
Philip J Peters
San Francisco Department of Public Health · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexually transmitted disease (STD) program and clinic staff play an important role in providing linkage and referrals to programs and services that address the complex medical and psychosocial needs of their clients. We synthesized recent published literature related to effective practices for linkage to care for HIV and referral to other medical and social services.

methodsThree PubMed searches were conducted to identify relevant studies published since 2004 on (1) linkage to HIV care, (2) referral within STD clinical contexts, and (3) (review articles only) referral practices among all medical specialties. Systematic review procedures were not used.

resultsThirty-three studies were included in this review. Studies highlight the limited value of passive referral practices and the increased effectiveness of active referral and linkage practices. Numerous studies on linkage to HIV care suggest that case management approaches, cultural-linguistic concordance between linkage staff and clients, and structural features such as colocation facilitate timely linkage to care. Integration of other medical and social services such as family planning and alcohol screening services into STD settings may be optimal but resource-intensive. Active referral practices such as having a written referral protocols and agreements, using information technology to help transfer information between providers, and making appointments for clients may offer some benefit. Few studies included information on program costs associated with linkage and referral.

conclusionsRecent literature provides some guideposts for STD program and clinical staff to use in determining their approach to helping link and refer clients to needed care. Much experience with these issues within STD services remains unpublished, and key gaps in the literature remain.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDelivery of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalProgram EvaluationReferral and ConsultationSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26779689
PMCPMC6742434
OpenAlexW2413245275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.