ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2016
Interventions to Improve Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening in Clinic-Based Settings.
Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incentive-Based Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections Screening in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Staff-Directed Electronic Medical Record Alert to Increase Chlamydia Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Randomized Trial of a Sexual Health Video Intervention for Black and Hispanic Adolescent Females.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Trial
- Global Burden of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in Older Men: A Trend Analysis Study.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation of a free mail-in opt-out STI testing programme on 3-month rescreening rates in reproductive health centres.Sexually transmitted infections · 2026Article
- What psychosocial factors shape HIV testing willingness among Chinese college students? A cross-sectional survey integrating PLS-SEM and fsQCA.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Adolescent Sexual Behavior, Contraceptive Use, and STI Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic (January-June 2021).Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2025Article
- The burden of skin diseases in China: global burden of Disease Study 2019.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Article
- Coinfection and repeat bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI) - retrospective study on male attendees of public STI clinics in an Asia Pacific city.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- Adherence to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening in Pregnancy.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Trends in sexually transmitted infection screening during COVID-19 and missed cases among adolescents.Public health · 2022Article
- Chlamydia Trachomatis/Neisseria Gonorrhea Retesting Among Adolescents and Young Adults in a Primary Care Network.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022Article
- Automated STI/HIV risk assessments: Testing an online clinical algorithm in Ottawa, Canada.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2021Article
- An Intervention to Improve Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Among Adolescents in Primary Care.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Use of Electronic Health Records at Federally Qualified Health Centers: a Potent Tool to Increase Viral Hepatitis Screening and Address the Climbing Incidence of Liver Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Review
- Patient perspectives on the implementation of routinised syphilis screening with HIV viral load testing: Qualitative process evaluation of the Enhanced Syphilis Screening Among HIV-positive Men trial.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe asymptomatic nature and suboptimal screening rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) call for implementation of successful interventions to improve screening in community-based clinic settings with attention to cost and resources.
methodsWe used MEDLINE to systematically review comparative analyses of interventions to improve STD (chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis) screening or rescreening in clinic-based settings that were published between January 2000 and January 2014. Absolute differences in the percent of the target population screened between comparison groups or relative percent increase in the number of tests or patients tested were used to score the interventions as highly effective (>20% increase) or moderately effective (5%-19% increase) in improving screening. Published cost of the interventions was described where available and, when not available, was estimated.
resultsOf the 4566 citations reviewed, 38 articles describing 42 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Of the 42 interventions, 16 (38.1%) were categorized as highly effective and 14 (33.3%) as moderately effective. Effective low-cost interventions (<$1000) included the strategic placement of specimen collection materials or automatic collection of STD specimens as part of a routine visit (7 highly effective and 1 moderately effective) and the use of electronic health records (EHRs; 3 highly effective and 4 moderately effective). Patient reminders for screening or rescreening (via text, telephone, and postcards) were highly effective (3) or moderately effective (2) and low or moderate cost (<$1001-10,000). Interventions with dedicated clinic staff to improve STD screening were highly effective (2) or moderately effective in improving STD screening (1) but high-cost ($10,001-$100,000).
conclusionsSuccessful interventions include changing clinic flow to routinely collect specimens for testing, using EHR screening reminders, and reminding patients to get screened or rescreened. These strategies can be tailored to different clinic settings to improve screening at a low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.