ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2016
Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Policies in the United States: Evidence and Opportunities.
Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increasing STI and HIV Preventive Behaviors and Addressing Community-Prioritized Social Determinants of Health Among Young GBQMSM and Transgender Women of Color: Piloting a Bilingual Multilevel Intervention.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- Syphilis response policies and their assessments: A scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Increases in the Estimated Number of Reported Gonorrhea Cases Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: The Role of Testing.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2019Article
- Changes in Patient Visits After the Implementation of Insurance Billing at a Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in a Medicaid Expansion State.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2019Article
- Article
- Assessing Spatial Relationships between Race, Inequality, Crime, and Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in the United States.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017Article
- Partner Services in Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Programs: A Review.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2016Review
- Using Mixed Methods and Multidisciplinary Research to Strengthen Policy Assessments Focusing on Populations at High Risk for Sexually Transmitted Diseases.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- Existence, Distribution, and Characteristics of STD Clinics in the United States, 2017.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- Evaluation of Strategies to Improve Uptake of Expedited Partner Therapy forMDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Policies are an important part of public health interventions, including in the area of sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention. Similar to other tools used in public health, policies are often evaluated to determine their usefulness. Therefore, we conducted a nonsystematic review of policy evidence for STD prevention. Our review considers assessments or evaluations of STD prevention-specific policies, health care system policies, and other, broader policies that have the potential to impact STD prevention through social determinants of health. We also describe potential policy opportunity in these areas. It should be noted that we found gaps in policy evidence for some areas; thus, additional research would be useful for public health policy interventions for STD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.