Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779370›Full record

ReviewCancer biology & medicine2015

MicroRNA: a new and promising potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Manish K Pal, Shyam P Jaiswar, Vinaya N Dwivedi, Amit K Tripathi, Ashish Dwivedi, Pushplata Sankhwar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer biology & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manish K Pal1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Shyam P Jaiswar1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Vinaya N Dwivedi1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Amit K Tripathi1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Ashish Dwivedi1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
Pushplata Sankhwar1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, UP 226003, India ; 2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory Center for Advanced Study in Zoology, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India ; 3 Endocrinology Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, UP 226001, India ; 4 Photobiology Division, Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, MG Marg, Lucknow, UP 226001, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death among all gynecological malignancies. Despite the technological and medical advances over the past four decades, such as the development of several biological markers (mRNA and proteins biomarkers), the mortality rate of ovarian cancer remains a challenge because of its late diagnosis, which is specifically attributed to low specificities and sensitivities. Under this compulsive scenario, recent advances in expression biology have shifted in identifying and developing specific and sensitive biomarkers, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. MiRNAs are a novel class of small non-coding RNAs that deregulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level, either by translational repression or by mRNA degradation. These mechanisms may be involved in a complex cascade of cellular events associated with the pathophysiology of many types of cancer. MiRNAs are easily detectable in tissue and blood samples of cancer patients. Therefore, miRNAs hold good promise as potential biomarkers in ovarian cancer. In this review, we attempted to provide a comprehensive profile of key miRNAs involved in ovarian carcinoma to establish miRNAs as more reliable non-invasive clinical biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer compared with protein and DNA biomarkers.

Indexed as

biomarkerchemoresistancedetectionMicroRNAs (miRNA)RT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID26779370
PMCPMC4706521
OpenAlexW2208367991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.