Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779334›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2015

Anti-inflammatory liposomes have no impact on liver regeneration in rats.

Betina Norman Jepsen, Kasper Jarlhelt Andersen, Anders Riegels Knudsen, Jens Randel Nyengaard, Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit, Pia Svendsen, Anders Etzerodt, Holger Jon Møller, Søren Kragh Moestrup, Jonas Heilskov Graversen and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 6-Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Targeting of CD163International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Betina Norman JepsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kasper Jarlhelt AndersenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders Riegels KnudsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Randel NyengaardStereology & Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Centre for Stochastic Geometry and Advanced Bioimaging, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stephen Hamilton-DutoitInstitute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pia SvendsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders EtzerodtDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Holger Jon MøllerDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren Kragh MoestrupDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jonas Heilskov GraversenAffinicon ApS, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Frank Viborg MortensenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical resection is the gold standard in treatment of hepatic malignancies, giving the patient the best chance to be cured. The liver has a unique capacity to regenerate. However, an inflammatory response occurs during resection, in part mediated by Kupffer cells, that influences the speed of regeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a Kupffer cell targeted anti-inflammatory treatment on liver regeneration in rats.

methodsTwo sets of animals, each including four groups of eight rats, were included. Paired groups from each set received treatment with placebo, low dose dexamethasone, high dose dexamethasone or low dose anti-CD163 dexamethasone. Subsequently, the rats underwent 70% partial hepatectomy. The two sets were evaluated on postoperative day 2 or 5, respectively. Blood was drawn for circulating markers of inflammation and liver cell damage; liver tissue was sampled for analysis of regeneration rate and proliferation index.

resultsThe high dose dexamethasone group had significantly lower body and liver weight than the placebo and anti-CD163-dex groups. There were no differences in liver regeneration rates between groups. Hepatocyte proliferation was completed faster in the placebo group, although this was not significant. The anti-CD163-dex group showed increased blood levels of albumin and alanine aminotransferase and a diminished inflammatory response in terms of significantly reduced haptoglobin, α2-macroglobulin and Interleukine-6.

conclusionLow dose dexamethasone targeted to Kupffer cells does not affect histological liver cell regeneration after 70% hepatectomy in rats, but reduces the inflammatory response judged by circulating markers of inflammation.

Indexed as

CD-163-DexamethasoneHepatic surgeryLiver regeneration

Identifiers

PMID26779334
PMCPMC4685239
OpenAlexW1907264032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.