Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779257›Full record

ArticleScience China. Mathematics2015

A selective overview of feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional data.

Liu JingYuan, Zhong Wei, L I RunZe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Mathematics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sure Joint Screening for High Dimensional Cox's Proportional Hazards Model Under the Case-Cohort Design.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liu JingYuanDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Statistical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Zhong WeiWang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; Department of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Statistical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
L I RunZeDepartment of Statistics and The Methodology Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-2111, USA.

Funding

Research Training and Educational Component (Component I) p370-385P50DA036107 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FOULDS, JONATHAN, MUSCAT, JOSHUA E · 2013 to 2018
$19.5M
Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LI, RUNZE · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036107NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional data have frequently been collected in many scientific areas including genomewide association study, biomedical imaging, tomography, tumor classifications, and finance. Analysis of high-dimensional data poses many challenges for statisticians. Feature selection and variable selection are fundamental for high-dimensional data analysis. The sparsity principle, which assumes that only a small number of predictors contribute to the response, is frequently adopted and deemed useful in the analysis of high-dimensional data. Following this general principle, a large number of variable selection approaches via penalized least squares or likelihood have been developed in the recent literature to estimate a sparse model and select significant variables simultaneously. While the penalized variable selection methods have been successfully applied in many high-dimensional analyses, modern applications in areas such as genomics and proteomics push the dimensionality of data to an even larger scale, where the dimension of data may grow exponentially with the sample size. This has been called ultrahigh-dimensional data in the literature. This work aims to present a selective overview of feature screening procedures for ultrahigh-dimensional data. We focus on insights into how to construct marginal utilities for feature screening on specific models and motivation for the need of model-free feature screening procedures.

Indexed as

correlation learningdistance correlationsure independence screeningsure joint screeningsure screening propertyultrahigh-dimensional data

Identifiers

PMID26779257
PMCPMC4711389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.