Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

The Phenotypic and Genetic Underpinnings of Flower Size in Polemoniaceae.

Jacob B Landis, Rebecca D O'Toole, Kayla L Ventura, Matthew A Gitzendanner, David G Oppenheimer, Douglas E Soltis, Pamela S Soltis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacob B LandisDepartment of Biology, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA.
Rebecca D O'TooleFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kayla L VenturaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Matthew A GitzendannerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
David G OppenheimerDepartment of Biology, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Genetics Institute, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA.
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Genetics Institute, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Genetics Institute, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corolla length is a labile flower feature and has strong implications for pollinator success. However, the phenotypic and genetic bases of corolla elongation are not well known, largely due to a lack of good candidate genes for potential genetic exploration and functional work. We investigate both the cellular phenotypic differences in corolla length, as well as the genetic control of this trait, in Saltugilia (Polemoniaceae). Taxa in this clade exhibit a large range of flower sizes and differ dramatically in pollinator guilds. Flowers of each species were collected from multiple individuals during four stages of flower development to ascertain if cell number or cell size is more important in determining flower size. In Saltugilia, increased flower size during development appears to be driven more by cell size than cell number. Differences in flower size between species are governed by both cell size and cell number, with the large-flowered S. splendens subsp. grantii having nearly twice as many cells as the small-flowered species. Fully mature flowers of all taxa contain jigsaw cells similar to cells seen in sepals and leaves; however, these cells are not typically found in the developing flowers of most species. The proportion of this cell type in mature flowers appears to have substantial implications, comprising 17-68% of the overall flower size. To identify candidate genes responsible for differences in cell area and cell type, transcriptomes were generated for two individuals of the species with the smallest (S. australis) and largest (S. splendens subsp. grantii) flowers across the same four developmental stages visualized with confocal microscopy. Analyses identified genes associated with cell wall formation that are up-regulated in the mature flower stage compared to mid-stage flowers (75% of mature size). This developmental change is associated with the origin of jigsaw cells in the corolla tube of mature flowers. Further comparisons between mature flowers in the two species revealed 354 transcripts that are up-regulated in the large-flowered S. splendens subsp. grantii compared to the small-flowered S. australis. These results are likely broadly applicable to Polemoniaceae, a clade of nearly 400 species, with extensive variation in floral form and shape.

Indexed as

comparative transcriptomicsfloral evo-devoflower epidermal cellsphylogenyPolemoniaceaepollinator-mediated selectionSaltugilia

Identifiers

PMID26779209
PMCPMC4700140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.