ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015
Evaluation of Secretion Prediction Highlights Differing Approaches Needed for Oomycete and Fungal Effectors.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraspecies sequence-graph analysis of the Phytophthora theobromicola genome reveals a dynamic structure and variable effector repertoires.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Identification and characterization of specific motifs in effector proteins of plant parasites using MOnSTER.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Article
- The structural landscape and diversity of Pyricularia oryzae MAX effectors revisited.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Approaches Provide New Insights into the Identification of Putative Fungal Effectors fromMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Key processes required for the different stages of fungal carnivory by a nematode-trapping fungus.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Effector Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A tell tail sign: a conserved C-terminal tail-anchor domain targets a subset of pathogen effectors to the plant endoplasmic reticulum.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Genome analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis of FusariumMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Chromosome-level assembly of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Genome Analysis of the Broad Host Range NecrotrophFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Computational Structural Genomics Unravels Common Folds and Novel Families in the Secretome of Fungal PhytopathogenMolecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI · 2021Article
- An automated and combinative method for the predictive ranking of candidate effector proteins of fungal plant pathogens.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Comparative analyses of saprotrophy in Salisapilia sapeloensis and diverse plant pathogenic oomycetes reveal lifestyle-specific gene expression.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2020Article
- EffHunter: A Tool for Prediction of Effector Protein Candidates in Fungal Proteomic Databases.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Comparative Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of Three WidespreadMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Genome reconstruction of the non-culturable spinach downy mildew Peronospora effusa by metagenome filtering.PloS one · 2020Article
- Receptor-Like Kinases BAK1 and SOBIR1 Are Required for Necrotizing Activity of a Novel Group ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The steadily increasing number of sequenced fungal and oomycete genomes has enabled detailed studies of how these eukaryotic microbes infect plants and cause devastating losses in food crops. During infection, fungal and oomycete pathogens secrete effector molecules which manipulate host plant cell processes to the pathogen's advantage. Proteinaceous effectors are synthesized intracellularly and must be externalized to interact with host cells. Computational prediction of secreted proteins from genomic sequences is an important technique to narrow down the candidate effector repertoire for subsequent experimental validation. In this study, we benchmark secretion prediction tools on experimentally validated fungal and oomycete effectors. We observe that for a set of fungal SwissProt protein sequences, SignalP 4 and the neural network predictors of SignalP 3 (D-score) and SignalP 2 perform best. For effector prediction in particular, the use of a sensitive method can be desirable to obtain the most complete candidate effector set. We show that the neural network predictors of SignalP 2 and 3, as well as TargetP were the most sensitive tools for fungal effector secretion prediction, whereas the hidden Markov model predictors of SignalP 2 and 3 were the most sensitive tools for oomycete effectors. Thus, previous versions of SignalP retain value for oomycete effector prediction, as the current version, SignalP 4, was unable to reliably predict the signal peptide of the oomycete Crinkler effectors in the test set. Our assessment of subcellular localization predictors shows that cytoplasmic effectors are often predicted as not extracellular. This limits the reliability of secretion predictions that depend on these tools. We present our assessment with a view to informing future pathogenomics studies and suggest revised pipelines for secretion prediction to obtain optimal effector predictions in fungi and oomycetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.