Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26779108›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2015

eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review.

Serena Barello, Stefano Triberti, Guendalina Graffigna, Chiara Libreri, Silvia Serino, Judith Hibbard, Giuseppe Riva

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05416541 (Uncontrolled Disinformation About Regional Anesthesia From Social Media, and the Effect on the Pregnant Patients Decisions.), which is not on this map. Cited by 194 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05416541 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Uncontrolled Disinformation About Regional Anesthesia From Social Media, and the Effect on the Pregnant Patients Decisions.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2022 to 2023Enrolled250ConditionsRegional Anesthesia, Anxiety, Social Media Addiction, Spinal AnesthesiaArmssocial media
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Serena BarelloDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan, Italy.
Stefano TribertiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan, Italy.
Guendalina GraffignaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan, Italy.
Chiara LibreriDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan, Italy.
Silvia SerinoApplied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan, Italy.
Judith HibbardDepartment of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, USA.
Giuseppe RivaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

eHealth interventions are recognized to have a tremendous potential to promote patient engagement. To date, the majority of studies examine the efficacy of eHealth in enhancing clinical outcomes without focusing on patient engagement in its specificity. This paper aimed at reviewing findings from the literature about the use of eHealth in engaging patients in their own care process. We undertook a comprehensive literature search within the peer-reviewed international literature. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. eHealth interventions reviewed were mainly devoted to foster only partial dimensions of patient engagement (i.e., alternatively cognitive, emotional or behavioral domains related to healthcare management), thus failing to consider the complexity of such an experience. This also led to a great heterogeneity of technologies, assessed variables and achieved outcomes. This systematic review underlines the need for a more holistic view of patient needs to actually engage them in eHealth interventions and obtaining positive outcomes. In this sense, patient engagement constitute a new frontiers for healthcare models where eHealth could maximize its potentialities.

Indexed as

eHealthpatient activationpatient engagementpatient experiencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26779108
PMCPMC4705444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.