Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26778977›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

Models of Innate Neural Attractors and Their Applications for Neural Information Processing.

Ksenia P Solovyeva, Iakov M Karandashev, Alex Zhavoronkov, Witali L Dunin-Barkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. When neuro-robots go wrong: A review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ksenia P SolovyevaDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Center for Optical Neural Technologies, Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Nanoelectronics, Department of Nanometrology and Nanomaterials, Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyDolgoprudny, Russia.
Iakov M KarandashevDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Center for Optical Neural Technologies, Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Nanoelectronics, Department of Nanometrology and Nanomaterials, Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyDolgoprudny, Russia.
Alex ZhavoronkovInsilico Medicine, Emerging Technology Centers, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Witali L Dunin-BarkowskiDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Center for Optical Neural Technologies, Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Nanoelectronics, Department of Nanometrology and Nanomaterials, Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyDolgoprudny, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we reveal and explore a new class of attractor neural networks, based on inborn connections provided by model molecular markers, the molecular marker based attractor neural networks (MMBANN). Each set of markers has a metric, which is used to make connections between neurons containing the markers. We have explored conditions for the existence of attractor states, critical relations between their parameters and the spectrum of single neuron models, which can implement the MMBANN. Besides, we describe functional models (perceptron and SOM), which obtain significant advantages over the traditional implementation of these models, while using MMBANN. In particular, a perceptron, based on MMBANN, gets specificity gain in orders of error probabilities values, MMBANN SOM obtains real neurophysiological meaning, the number of possible grandma cells increases 1000-fold with MMBANN. MMBANN have sets of attractor states, which can serve as finite grids for representation of variables in computations. These grids may show dimensions of d = 0, 1, 2,…. We work with static and dynamic attractor neural networks of the dimensions d = 0 and 1. We also argue that the number of dimensions which can be represented by attractors of activities of neural networks with the number of elements N = 10(4) does not exceed 8.

Indexed as

bump attractorcortical columndynamic attractorHopfield networksinnate connectionsneural networksself-organizing mapping

Identifiers

PMID26778977
PMCPMC4700189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.