ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2015
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Brain Stimulation in Improving Clinical Signs of Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does non-invasive brain stimulation reduce essential tremor? A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Acute effects of a single session of multitarget continuous Theta-Burst stimulation for essential Tremor: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled trial.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025Trial
- Inhibitory rTMS applied on somatosensory cortex in Wilson's disease patients with hand dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2017Trial
- Reduced intracortical inhibition and enhanced intracortical facilitation in patients with functional tremor.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Limited Potential of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Essential Tremor: A Systematic Review.NeuroSci · 2024Review
- Applications of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Understanding and Treating Dystonia.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Review
- The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Essential Tremor: The Role of Adenosine and Dopamine Receptors in Animal Models.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- The Expanding Horizon of Neural Stimulation for Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Atrophy of cerebellar peduncles in essential tremor: a machine learning-based volumetric analysis.European radiology · 2019Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for focal leg dystonia: a case report.Journal of clinical movement disorders · 2019Article
- A data mining approach using cortical thickness for diagnosis and characterization of essential tremor.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial of Pre-Supplementary Motor Area (Pre-SMA) 1 Hz rTMS to Treat Essential Tremor.Brain stimulationArticle
- The Role of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Enhancing the Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and painless method for stimulating cortical neurons. In neurological realm, rTMS has prevalently been applied to understand pathophysiological mechanisms underlying movement disorders. However, this tool has also the potential to be translated into a clinically applicable therapeutic use. Several available studies supported this hypothesis, but differences in protocols, clinical enrollment, and variability of rTMS effects across individuals complicate better understanding of efficient clinical protocols. The aim of this present review is to discuss to what extent the evidence provided by the therapeutic use of rTMS may be generalized. In particular, we attempted to define optimal cortical regions and stimulation protocols that have been demonstrated to maximize the effectiveness seen in the actual literature for the three most prevalent hyperkinetic movement disorders: Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs), essential tremor (ET) and dystonia. A total of 28 rTMS studies met our search criteria. Despite clinical and methodological differences, overall these studies demonstrated that therapeutic applications of rTMS to "normalize" pathologically decreased or increased levels of cortical activity have given moderate progress in patient's quality of life. Moreover, the present literature suggests that altered pathophysiology in hyperkinetic movement disorders establishes motor, premotor or cerebellar structures as candidate regions to reset cortico-subcortical pathways back to normal. Although rTMS has the potential to become a powerful tool for ameliorating the clinical outcome of hyperkinetic neurological patients, until now there is not a clear consensus on optimal protocols for these motor disorders. Well-controlled multicenter randomized clinical trials with high numbers of patients are urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.