Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26778653›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2016

Effects of internal and external vividness on hippocampal connectivity during memory retrieval.

Jaclyn H Ford, Elizabeth A Kensinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Age-by-Emotion Interactions in Memory Retrieval Processes: An Event-Related Potential Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Age-Related Reversals in Neural Recruitment across Memory Retrieval Phases.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaclyn H FordDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, United States. Electronic address: JaclynHFord@gmail.com.
Elizabeth A KensingerDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, United States.

Funding

How Emotion Affects Memory for Detail: Behavioral and Neuroimaging InvestigationsR01MH080833 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI KENSINGER, ELIZABETH ANN · 2008 to 2016
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful memory for an image can be supported by retrieval of one's personal reaction to the image (i.e., internal vividness), as well as retrieval of the specific details of the image itself (i.e., external vividness). Prior research suggests that memory vividness relies on regions within the medial temporal lobe, particularly the hippocampus, but it is unclear whether internal and external vividness are supported by the hippocampus in a similar way. To address this open question, the current study examined hippocampal connectivity associated with enhanced internal and external vividness ratings during retrieval. Participants encoded complex visual images paired with verbal titles. During a scanned retrieval session, they were presented with the titles and asked whether each had been seen with an image during encoding. Following retrieval of each image, participants were asked to rate internal and external vividness. Increased hippocampal activity was associated with higher vividness ratings for both scales, supporting prior evidence implicating the hippocampus in retrieval of memory detail. However, different patterns of hippocampal connectivity related to enhanced external and internal vividness. Further, hippocampal connectivity with medial prefrontal regions was associated with increased ratings of internal vividness, but with decreased ratings of external vividness. These findings suggest that the hippocampus may contribute to increased internal and external vividness via distinct mechanisms and that external and internal vividness of memories should be considered as separable measures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConnectomeEmotionsFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexThinkingVisual PerceptionYoung AdultExternal vividnessHippocampal connectivityInternal vividnessMemory

Identifiers

PMID26778653
PMCPMC4938785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.