Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26778300›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2016

Expression Levels of DNA Damage Repair Proteins Are Associated With Overall Survival in Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Stephanie A Mullane, Lillian Werner, Elizabeth A Guancial, Rosina T Lis, Edward C Stack, Massimo Loda, Philip W Kantoff, Toni K Choueiri, Jonathan Rosenberg, Joaquim Bellmunt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Emerging biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma: Challenges and opportunities.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A MullaneBladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lillian WernerBiostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Elizabeth A GuancialDepartment of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Rosina T LisCenter for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Edward C StackCenter for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Massimo LodaDepartment of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Philip W KantoffBladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Toni K ChoueiriBladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jonathan RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Joaquim BellmuntBladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: joaquim_bellmunt@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombination platinum chemotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Defining the platinum response biomarkers for patients with mUC could establish personalize medicine and provide insights into mUC biology. Although DNA repair mechanisms have been hypothesized to mediate the platinum response, we sought to analyze whether increased expression of DNA damage genes would correlate with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with mUC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively identified a clinically annotated cohort of patients with mUC, who had been treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy. A tissue microarray was constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumor before treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis of the following DNA repair proteins was performed: ERCC1, RAD51, BRCA1/2, PAR, and PARP-1. Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression was analyzed using multispectral imaging. Nuclear staining was used for the survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between the percentage of positive nuclear staining and OS in multivariable analysis, controlling for known prognostic variables.

resultsIn a cohort of 104 patients with mUC, a greater percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-4.9; P = .0007), RAD51 (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.3; P = .005), and PAR (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .026) was associated with worse OS. BRCA1, BRCA2, and PARP-1 expression was not associated with OS (P = .76, P = .38, and P = .09, respectively). A greater percentage of combined ERCC1 and RAD51 nuclear staining was strongly associated with worse OS (P = .005).

conclusionA high percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1, RAD51, and PAR, assessed by immunohistochemistry, correlated with worse OS for patients with mUC treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy, supporting the evidence of the DNA repair pathways' role in the prognosis of mUC. We also report new evidence that RAD51 and PAR might play a role in the platinum response. Additional prospective studies are required to determine the prognostic or predictive nature of these biomarkers in mUC.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarcinoma, Transitional CellDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairEndonucleasesFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm ProteinsPlatinumPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Prospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsJTB protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsPARP1 protein, humanPlatinumPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1RAD51 protein, humanRad51 RecombinaseBladder cancerDNA damageImmunohistochemistryPlatinum chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26778300
PMCPMC5508512
OpenAlexW2202440845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.