Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26778163›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2016

Using frogs faces to dissect the mechanisms underlying human orofacial defects.

Amanda J G Dickinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Many Faces ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Identification ofGenetics · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Modeling human craniofacial disorders inCurrent pathobiology reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Role of JNK during buccopharyngeal membrane perforation, the last step of embryonic mouth formation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amanda J G DickinsonDepartment of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 West Main St., Richmond, VA 23284, United States. Electronic address: ajdickinson@vcu.edu.

Funding

Using Frog Faces to Better Understand Clefts in the Primary PalateR01DE023553 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICKINSON, AMANDA JANE · 2014 to 2017
$892k
NIDCR NIH HHS 5R01DE023553-02NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review I discuss how Xenopus laevis is an effective model to dissect the mechanisms underlying orofacial defects. This species has been particularly useful in studying the understudied structures of the developing face including the embryonic mouth and primary palate. The embryonic mouth is the first opening between the foregut and the environment and is critical for adult mouth development. The final step in embryonic mouth formation is the perforation of a thin layer of tissue covering the digestive tube called the buccopharyngeal membrane. When this tissue does not perforate in humans it can pose serious health risks for the fetus and child. The primary palate forms just dorsal to the embryonic mouth and in non-amniotes it functions as the roof of the adult mouth. Defects in the primary palate result in a median oral cleft that appears similar across the vertebrates. In humans, these median clefts are often severe and surgically difficult to repair. Xenopus has several qualities that make it advantageous for craniofacial research. The free living embryo has an easily accessible face and we have also developed several new tools to analyze the development of the region. Further, Xenopus is readily amenable to chemical screens allowing us to uncover novel gene-environment interactions during orofacial development, as well as to define underlying mechanisms governing such interactions. In conclusion, we are utilizing Xenopus in new and innovative ways to contribute to craniofacial research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsGene-Environment InteractionHumansMaxillofacial DevelopmentXenopus laevisBuccopharyngeal membraneGene-environment interactionsMedian cleftsOrofacial

Identifiers

PMID26778163
PMCPMC4798872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.