ArticleGynecologic oncology2016
Herniation formation in women undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- An 8-mm trocar-site hernia at a drainage insertion site after a three-port robotic myomectomy: case report and review of literature.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Review
- Comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy procedures in the radical hysterectomy surgery for endometrial cancer: a basic review.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
- Trocar site hernia development in patients undergoing robotically assisted or standard laparoscopic staging surgery for endometrial cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the incidence of trocar site hernia in women who underwent robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery (RBT) for endometrial cancer staging with the incidence of ventral hernia formation in patients who underwent laparotomy (LAP) for the same indication. To analyze risk factors for hernia formation in women undergoing RBT for endometrial cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively identified all patients who underwent surgical staging for endometrial cancer via RBT or LAP from 2009-2012. Clinicopathologic data were analyzed. Appropriate statistical tests were used.
results738 patients were staged via RBT (n=567) or LAP (n=171). Overall median age was 61 years (RBT range, 33-90; LAP range,28-86; p=0.4). Median BMI was 29.5 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-66) and 30.3 kg/m(2) (range, 16.8-67.2), respectively (p=1.0). Eleven (1.9%) of 567 patients in the RBT cohort developed a trocar site hernia compared with 11 (6.4%) of 171 LAP patients who developed a ventral hernia (p=0.002). Median time to diagnosis was 18 months (range, 3-49) and 17 months (range, 7-30), respectively (p=0.7). Of the 11 RBT patients who developed a trocar site hernia, 10 (91%) were midline defects and 1 (9%) was a lateral defect of a prior inferior epigastric port site. No hernias required emergent operative intervention. Four (0.7%) of 567 RBT patients compared with 2 (1.2%) of 171 LAP patients required surgical hernia repair (p=0.4).
conclusionsTrocar site herniation after RBT staging for endometrial cancer is uncommon and less likely to occur than ventral hernia formation with LAP staging. Furthermore, surgical revision rates are low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.