ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2016
Use of protein G microcolumns in chromatographic immunoassays: A comparison of competitive binding formats.
Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Recent Advances in Supramolecular Affinity Separations: Affinity Chromatography and Related Methods.Advances in chromatography · 2021Article
- Affinity chromatography: A review of trends and developments over the past 50 years.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2020Review
- Peak decay analysis and biointeraction studies of immunoglobulin binding and dissociation on protein G affinity microcolumns.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018Article
- High performance affinity chromatography and related separation methods for the analysis of biological and pharmaceutical agents.The Analyst · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Affinity microcolumns containing protein G were used as general platforms for creating chromatographic-based competitive binding immunoassays. Human serum albumin (HSA) was used as a model target for this work and HSA tagged with a near infrared fluorescent dye was utilized as the label. The protein G microcolumns were evaluated for use in several assay formats, including both solution-based and column-based competitive binding immunoassays and simultaneous or sequential injection formats. All of these methods were characterized by using the same amounts of labeled HSA and anti-HSA antibodies per sample, as chosen for the analysis of a protein target in the low-to-mid ng/mL range. The results were used to compare these formats in terms of their response, precision, limit of detection, and analysis time. All these methods gave detection limits in the range of 8-19ng/mL and precisions ranging from ±5% to ±10% when using an injection flow rate of 0.10mL/min. The column-based sequential injection immunoassay provided the best limit of detection and the greatest change in response at low target concentrations, while the solution-based simultaneous injection method had the broadest linear and dynamic ranges. These results provided valuable guidelines that can be employed to develop and extend the use of protein G microcolumns and these competitive binding formats to other protein biomarkers or biological agents of clinical or pharmaceutical interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.