Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26777312›Full record

SynthesisActa tropica2016

A global systematic review of Chagas disease prevalence among migrants.

Erin E Conners, Joseph M Vinetz, John R Weeks, Kimberly C Brouwer

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta tropica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. ExploringAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The epidemiology of Chagas disease in the Americas.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New Insights into the Role of thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Serosurvey ofFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E ConnersDivision of Global Public Health University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC-0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA; Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health, University of California San Diego and San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Joseph M VinetzSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC-0760, La Jolla, CA 92093-0760, USA.
John R WeeksDepartment of Geography, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, Storm Hall 303B, San Diego, CA 92182-4493, USA.
Kimberly C BrouwerDivision of Global Public Health University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC-0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA. Electronic address: kbrouwer@ucsd.edu.
San Diego State University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Maile Ann Young Karris · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
Training Program in Substance Use, HIV and Related InfectionsT32DA023356 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Natasha Martin, Steffanie A Strathdee · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA023356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human migration has been identified as a potential factor for increased Chagas disease risk and has transformed the disease from a Latin American problem to a global one. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature between 2004-2014 in order to: summarize recent seroprevalence estimates of Chagas disease among Latin American migrants, in both endemic and non-endemic settings; compare seroprevalence estimates in migrants to countrywide prevalence estimates; and identify risk factors for Chagas disease among migrants. A total of 320 studies were screened and 23 studies were included. We found evidence that the prevalence of Chagas disease is higher than expected in some migrant groups and that reliance on blood donor screening prevalence estimates underestimates the burden of disease. Overall there is a dearth of high quality epidemiologic studies on the prevalence of Chagas disease in migrants, especially among intra-regional migrants within Latin America. Given that this zoonotic disease cannot likely be eradicated, improved surveillance and reporting is vital to continuing control efforts. More accurate health surveillance of both Latin American migrants and the Chagas disease burden will help countries appropriately scale up their response to this chronic disease. Overall, improved estimates of Chagas disease among migrants would likely serve to highlight the real need for better screening, diagnostics, and treatment of individuals living with the disease.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsChagas DiseaseHumansLatin AmericaPrevalenceRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAmerican trypanosomiasisChagas diseaseImmigrationMigrationNeglected tropical diseaseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26777312
PMCPMC5155706
OpenAlexW2223995057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.