ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2016
KNOWLEDGE-ASSISTED APPROACH TO IDENTIFY PATHWAYS WITH DIFFERENTIAL DEPENDENCIES.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversal of inflammatory reprogramming by vasodilator agents in pulmonary hypertension.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Computational repurposing of therapeutic small molecules from cancer to pulmonary hypertension.Science advances · 2021Article
- Evolving Schema for Employing Network Biology Approaches to Understand Pulmonary Hypertension.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Systems Analysis of the Human Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Lung Transcriptome.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2019Article
- A composite network of conserved and tissue specific gene interactions reveals possible genetic interactions in glioma.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Contextualization of drug-mediator relations using evidence networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- DIFFERENTIAL PATHWAY DEPENDENCY DISCOVERY ASSOCIATED WITH DRUG RESPONSE ACROSS CANCER CELL LINES.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2017Article
- A transcriptome analysis of two grapevine populations segregating for tendril phyllotaxy.Horticulture research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have previously developed a statistical method to identify gene sets enriched with condition-specific genetic dependencies. The method constructs gene dependency networks from bootstrapped samples in one condition and computes the divergence between distributions of network likelihood scores from different conditions. It was shown to be capable of sensitive and specific identification of pathways with phenotype-specific dysregulation, i.e., rewiring of dependencies between genes in different conditions. We now present an extension of the method by incorporating prior knowledge into the inference of networks. The degree of prior knowledge incorporation has substantial effect on the sensitivity of the method, as the data is the source of condition specificity while prior knowledge incorporation can provide additional support for dependencies that are only partially supported by the data. Use of prior knowledge also significantly improved the interpretability of the results. Further analysis of topological characteristics of gene differential dependency networks provides a new approach to identify genes that could play important roles in biological signaling in a specific condition, hence, promising targets customized to a specific condition. Through analysis of TCGA glioblastoma multiforme data, we demonstrate the method can identify not only potentially promising targets but also underlying biology for new targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26776171PMC4721243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.