Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26775243›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2016

The ESCRT machinery: new roles at new holes.

Y Olmos, J G Carlton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. HIV Genome-Wide Protein Associations: a Review of 30 Years of Research.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Devising a divisome for synthetic cells.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell entry mechanisms of porcine enteric coronaviruses.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Y OlmosDivision of Cancer Studies, Section of Cell Biology and Imaging, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.
J G CarltonDivision of Cancer Studies, Section of Cell Biology and Imaging, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Jeremy.Carlton@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093603/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ESCRT machinery drives a diverse collection of membrane remodeling events, including multivesicular body biogenesis, release of enveloped retroviruses and both reformation of the nuclear envelope and cytokinetic abscission during mitotic exit. These events share the requirement for a topologically equivalent membrane remodeling for their completion and the cells deployment of the ESCRT machinery in these different contexts highlights its functionality as a transposable membrane-fission machinery. Here, we will examine recent data describing ESCRT-III dependent membrane remodeling and explore new roles for the ESCRT-III complex at the nuclear envelope.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportEndosomesHumansNuclear EnvelopeEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport

Identifiers

PMID26775243
PMCPMC5023845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.